Beta Evo 250 2T 2015 vs. GASGAS TXT 300 Pro 2014

Beta Evo 250 2T 2015

GASGAS TXT 300 Pro 2014
Loading...
Overview - Beta Evo 250 2T 2015 vs GASGAS TXT 300 Pro 2014

Beta Evo 250 2T 2015

GASGAS TXT 300 Pro 2014
Technical Specifications Beta Evo 250 2T 2015 compared to GASGAS TXT 300 Pro 2014
Beta Evo 250 2T 2015
GASGAS TXT 300 Pro 2014
Engine and Drive Train
Bore | Bore | 72.5 mm | Bore | 79 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stroke | Stroke | 60.5 mm | Stroke | 60 mm |
Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Chain |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 1 | Cylinders | 1 |
Strokes | Strokes | 2-Stroke | Strokes | 2-Stroke |
Cooling | Cooling | liquid | Cooling | liquid |
Displacement | Displacement | 249.7 ccm | Displacement | 294.1 ccm |
Suspension Front
Front suspension | Front suspension | Telescopic fork | Front suspension | Telescopic fork |
---|
Chassis
Frame | Frame | Aluminium | Frame | Chromium-molybdenum |
---|
Brakes Front
Piston | Piston | Four pistons | Piston | Four pistons |
---|
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Double piston | Piston | Double piston |
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 80 mm | Front tyre width | 70 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 21 inch | Front tyre diameter | 21 inch |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 110 mm | Rear tyre width | 110 mm |
Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 18 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 18 inch |
Length | Length | 1,990 mm | Length | 2,045 mm |
Width | Width | 850 mm | Width | 825 mm |
Height | Height | 1,115 mm | Height | 1,130 mm |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,305 mm | Wheelbase | 1,340 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 660 mm | Seat Height | 650 mm |
Dry Weight | Dry Weight | 68.5 kg | Dry Weight | 67 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 2.6 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 2.5 l |
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Beta Evo 250 2T vs GASGAS TXT 300 Pro
Price Beta Evo 250 2T
Model year
Current average market prices
Price GASGAS TXT 300 Pro
Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.