BMW S 1000 R 2016 vs. KTM 890 Duke R 2020

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

KTM 890 Duke R 2020

KTM 890 Duke R 2020

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2016 vs KTM 890 Duke R 2020

The BMW S 1000 R 2016 and the KTM 890 Duke R 2020 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, in-line configurations. However, there are notable differences in their technical specifications and overall performance.

In terms of engine power, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 boasts a higher output with 160 HP compared to the KTM 890 Duke R 2020's 121 HP. This indicates that the BMW model offers a more powerful and potentially faster riding experience.

The number of cylinders also differs between the two bikes, with the BMW S 1000 R 2016 having four cylinders and the KTM 890 Duke R 2020 featuring two cylinders. More cylinders generally result in smoother power delivery and greater torque, which could give the BMW an advantage in terms of acceleration and overall performance.

Both bikes have similar suspension setups, with upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspensions with monoshock absorbers at the rear. This configuration provides good handling and stability for both models.

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

When it comes to the chassis, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 features an aluminum frame, while the KTM 890 Duke R 2020 has a chromium-molybdenum frame. The choice of materials may impact the overall weight and rigidity of the bikes, with aluminum typically being lighter but potentially less rigid than chromium-molybdenum.

In terms of braking systems, both bikes have double disc brakes at the front with four-piston calipers and radial technology. This indicates that both models offer strong and reliable braking performance.

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 is equipped with dynamic suspension, while the KTM 890 Duke R 2020 offers a more comprehensive package including ABS, riding modes, and traction control. This suggests that the KTM model provides a higher level of electronic aids and customizable riding modes.

KTM 890 Duke R 2020

KTM 890 Duke R 2020

In terms of dimensions and weights, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 190 mm, while the KTM 890 Duke R 2020 has a slightly narrower rear tire width of 180 mm. The wheelbase of the BMW is 1439 mm, while the KTM has a longer wheelbase of 1482 mm. The seat height of the BMW is 814 mm, while the KTM has a slightly higher seat height of 834 mm. The fuel tank capacity of the BMW is 17.5 liters, while the KTM has a smaller tank capacity of 14 liters.

In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 offers a powerful and well-controllable engine, a powerful braking system, and a comfortable seating position. On the other hand, the KTM 890 Duke R 2020 boasts a great electronics package, high-quality brakes, an extensively adjustable chassis, a high-revving engine, and playful handling.

In terms of weaknesses, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 may have irresistible but expensive optional extras and a hard chassis. Meanwhile, the KTM 890 Duke R 2020 may exhibit slightly nervous tendencies and require a loose sitting position.

Overall, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 and the KTM 890 Duke R 2020 offer different strengths and weaknesses, catering to different rider preferences and riding styles. The BMW provides a more powerful and potentially faster riding experience, while the KTM offers a comprehensive electronics package and playful handling.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2016 compared to KTM 890 Duke R 2020

BMW S 1000 R 2016
KTM 890 Duke R 2020

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore90.7 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke68.8 mm
Engine powerEngine power160 HPEngine power121 HP
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement890 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter46 mmDiameter43 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameChromium-molybdenum
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTubular

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsDynamic suspensionAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,439 mmWheelbase1,482 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height814 mmSeat Height834 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

With the BMW S 1000 R, you notice both the close relationship to the S 1000 RR superbike and the endeavour to equip the machine with a high degree of comfort for country roads and everyday use. Accordingly, the 1000cc four-cylinder power unit is brute and yet easily controllable, and the seating position is correspondingly sporty and comfortable. The fact that the S 1000 R is one of the most affordable power naked bikes is surprising and very pleasing, although one must not get hold of the list of optional extras - because thanks to the many irresistible features, it will certainly be more expensive.

Powerful and well controllable engine

powerful braking system

comfortable seating position

irresistible but expensive optional extras

hard chassis

KTM 890 Duke R 2020

KTM 890 Duke R 2020

The KTM 890 Duke R appears playful, handy but with high-quality equipment. The engine and weight are reminiscent of much smaller motorbikes. The power unit revs up lively and hangs directly on the throttle. The bike turns easily and rides light-footed. Braking and the electronics package, however, are in the big league. Therefore, the 890 Duke is a fast and cool bike for country roads and racetracks.

Great electronics package

High-quality brakes

Extensively adjustable chassis

High-revving engine

Playful handling

Slightly nervous tendencies - loose sitting position necessary

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs KTM 890 Duke R

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2016 and a KTM 890 Duke R 2020. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2016 is about 4% higher. A BMW S 1000 R 2016 experiences a loss of 390 GBP in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 100 GBP for a KTM 890 Duke R 2020. Compared to KTM 890 Duke R 2020 there are less BMW S 1000 R 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 10 compared to 18. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 69 days compared to 76 days for a KTM 890 Duke R. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 15 reviews for the KTM 890 Duke R since model year 2020. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 03/11/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 126,600 views for the first review on KTM 890 Duke R published on 05/11/2019.

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price KTM 890 Duke R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG