Yamaha XJ6 2012 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2013

Yamaha XJ6 2012

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Overview - Yamaha XJ6 2012 vs Yamaha MT-09 2013

Yamaha XJ6 2012

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Technical Specifications Yamaha XJ6 2012 compared to Yamaha MT-09 2013

Yamaha XJ6 2012

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Show all

Same only

Differences

Yamaha XJ6 2012

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	65.5 mm	Bore	78 mm
Stroke	Stroke	44.5 mm	Stroke	59.1 mm
Engine power	Engine power	78 HP	Engine power	115 HP
Rpm at Max. Power	Rpm at Max. Power	10,000 rpm	Rpm at Max. Power	10,000 rpm
Torque	Torque	59.7 Nm	Torque	87.5 Nm
Rpm at Torque	Rpm at Torque	8,500 rpm	Rpm at Torque	8,500 rpm
Compression Ratio	Compression Ratio	12.2	Compression Ratio	11.5
Clutch Type	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath
Transmission	Transmission	Chain	Transmission	Chain
Number of gears	Number of gears	6	Number of gears	6
Cylinders	Cylinders	4	Cylinders	3
Strokes	Strokes	4-Stroke	Strokes	4-Stroke
Valves per cylinder	Valves per cylinder	4	Valves per cylinder	4
Valves	Valves	DOHC	Valves	DOHC
Displacement	Displacement	600 ccm	Displacement	847 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspension	Front suspension	Telescopic fork	Front suspension	Telescopic fork

Chassis

Frame	Frame	Steel	Frame	Aluminium
Frame type	Frame type	Twin Tube	Frame type	Twin Tube

Brakes Front

Type	Type	Double disk	Type	Double disk

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre width	Front tyre width	120 mm	Front tyre width	120 mm
Front tyre height	Front tyre height	70 %	Front tyre height	70 %
Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	17 inch	Front tyre diameter	17 inch
Rear tyre width	Rear tyre width	160 mm	Rear tyre width	180 mm
Rear tyre height	Rear tyre height	60 %	Rear tyre height	55 %
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	17 inch	Rear tyre diameter	17 inch
Length	Length	2,120 mm	Length	2,075 mm
Width	Width	770 mm	Width	815 mm
Height	Height	1,085 mm	Height	1,135 mm
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,440 mm	Wheelbase	1,440 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	785 mm	Seat Height	815 mm
Kerb Weight	Kerb Weight	205 kg	Kerb Weight	188 kg
Kerb Weight (with ABS)	Kerb Weight (with ABS)	210 kg	Kerb Weight (with ABS)	191 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	17 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	14 l
License compliancy	License compliancy	A	License compliancy	A

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha XJ6 2012

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Yamaha MT-09 2013

The start is frightening - abandonment of 1st gear.

Reasonable price

powerful engine

Hard chassis

high consumption

Alternative Comparisons

VS.

Yamaha MT-09 SP 2022 vs
Yamaha MT-09 2022

VS.

Yamaha MT-09 2021 vs
Honda CB 1000 R 2021

VS.

Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2009 vs
Yamaha XJ6 2010

VS.

Yamaha XJ6 2014 vs
Yamaha MT-07 2016

VS.

Harley-Davidson Softail Breakout 114 FXBRS 2020 vs
Yamaha MT-09 2021

VS.

Yamaha Tracer 9 GT 2022 vs
Yamaha MT-09 2022

VS.

Yamaha FZ-8N 2014 vs
Yamaha MT-09 2018

VS.

Honda VT 750 C2 Shadow Spirit 2011 vs
Yamaha XJ6 2014

VS.

BMW R 1250 RS 2021 vs
Yamaha MT-09 2021

VS.

Suzuki GSX-S 750 2020 vs
Yamaha MT-09 2020

VS.

Yamaha MT-09 2021 vs
Yamaha MT-10 2019

VS.

Triumph Speed Triple S 2020 vs
Yamaha MT-09 2021

VS.

Yamaha FZ1 2012 vs
Yamaha MT-09 2016