Rieju Marathon Cross 125 2018 vs. Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Rieju Marathon Cross 125 2018

Rieju Marathon Cross 125 2018

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Loading...

Overview - Rieju Marathon Cross 125 2018 vs Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Rieju Marathon Cross 125 2018

Rieju Marathon Cross 125 2018

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Technical Specifications Rieju Marathon Cross 125 2018 compared to Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Rieju Marathon Cross 125 2018
Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Engine and Drive Train

StarterStarterElectricStarterKick
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement124.9 ccmDisplacement124.8 ccm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width120 mmRear tyre width120 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height90 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
Seat HeightSeat Height900 mmSeat Height960 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.4 lFuel Tank Capacity11 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Rieju Marathon Cross 125 2018

Rieju Marathon Cross 125 2018

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

The beginner enduro for riders who want to do everything right from the start. Does not forgive shifting errors and always wants to be ridden in the right rev range. In 2017, the 125 was made even lighter - dry, the 125 weighs just 92 kg.

cheapest model

easy handling

best learning effect

Less forgiving of mistakes

limited engine power

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG