Kawasaki Z900 2018 vs. BMW F 900 R 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2018

Kawasaki Z900 2018

BMW F 900 R 2020

BMW F 900 R 2020

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z900 2018 vs BMW F 900 R 2020

When comparing the Kawasaki Z900 2018 and the BMW F 900 R 2020, there are several notable differences and similarities to consider.

In terms of engine specifications, both bikes have an inline engine type with liquid cooling. However, the Kawasaki Z900 has a larger engine displacement of 948cc compared to the BMW F 900 R's 895cc. The Z900 also has a higher engine power of 125.4 HP compared to the F 900 R's 105 HP. Additionally, the Z900 has a higher torque of 98.6 Nm compared to the F 900 R's 92 Nm. Both bikes have a fuel injection system and 4 cylinders.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and a swing arm with a monoshock at the rear. The suspension on both bikes can be adjusted for preload and rebound. This allows for customization and fine-tuning of the suspension to suit the rider's preferences.

Kawasaki Z900 2018

Kawasaki Z900 2018

Both bikes have a steel frame, with the Kawasaki Z900 having a double cradle frame and the BMW F 900 R having a twin tube, load-bearing engine frame. The frame design of the F 900 R is unique and contributes to its stability and handling.

When it comes to braking, both bikes have double disk brakes at the front with four pistons. However, the BMW F 900 R has larger brake disks with a diameter of 320mm compared to the Z900's 300mm. The F 900 R also features radial brake technology, which enhances braking performance and feel.

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, both bikes have ABS. However, the BMW F 900 R goes a step further and includes additional features such as anti-slipping control and riding modes. These additional systems enhance safety and provide more control in different riding conditions.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire width and diameter. However, the BMW F 900 R has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1518mm compared to the Z900's 1450mm. The seat height is also slightly higher on the F 900 R at 815mm compared to the Z900's 795mm. Both bikes have a similar kerb weight, with the F 900 R weighing slightly more at 211kg compared to the Z900's 210kg.

BMW F 900 R 2020

BMW F 900 R 2020

In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki Z900 2018 is praised for its powerful and smooth engine, great sound, sharp and sporty look, low seating position, and easy handling and manoeuvrability. On the other hand, the BMW F 900 R 2020 is praised for its easy handling, high stability, fine response from the chassis, well-behaved engine, and reliable brakes. The F 900 R also has the advantage of offering an extensive list of accessories for customization.

In terms of weaknesses, the Kawasaki Z900 2018 lacks traction control, which could be seen as a disadvantage for riders seeking additional safety features. Additionally, tall riders may find the knee angle strenuous during long rides. The BMW F 900 R 2020 has a smaller fuel tank capacity of 13 liters, which may require more frequent refueling. However, the engine performance of the F 900 R is generally considered to be good.

Overall, both the Kawasaki Z900 2018 and the BMW F 900 R 2020 have their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two would depend on the rider's preferences and priorities, such as desired engine power, advanced rider assistance systems, and customization options.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z900 2018 compared to BMW F 900 R 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2018
BMW F 900 R 2020

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore86 mm
StrokeStroke56 mmStroke77 mm
Engine powerEngine power125.4 HPEngine power105 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpm
TorqueTorque98.6 NmTorque92 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,700 rpmRpm at Torque6,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.8 Compression Ratio13.1
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement948 ccmDisplacement895 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter43 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel135 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel140 mmTravel142 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentPreload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engine
RakeRake65 degreeRake60.5 degree
TrailTrail105 mmTrail114.3 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter300 mmDiameter320 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Anti-slipping control, Riding modes

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,070 mmLength2,140 mm
WidthWidth820 mmWidth815 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,518 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height795 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)210 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)211 kg
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z900 2018

Kawasaki Z900 2018

In the hotly contested naked bike segment, the Z900 plays right at the front. Above all, its engine is absolutely terrific, runs incredibly silky and offers rich power in all rev regions - as befits a Japanese four-cylinder. Its sporty, aggressive appearance matches this. It does without electronic bells and whistles, but still conveys a lot of confidence when chasing corners, braking and accelerating out of them. The low seat is especially beneficial for smaller riders, but taller riders might miss a flatter knee angle on long distances. The low weight and compactness make the Z900 particularly agile and easy to handle. A sporting cannon that is also extremely appealing in terms of price

Powerful and silky engine

great sound

chassis

sharp, sporty look

low seating position

easy handling and manoeuvrability.

Lack of traction control

Knee angle strenuous for tall riders in the long run

BMW F 900 R 2020

BMW F 900 R 2020

The BMW F 900 R offers easy-to-use cornering fun, enormously high stability, an active yet comfortable riding position and a smooth but also unemotional engine. Those who like it fast and twisty will be happy with it. The possibilities for configuration are almost endless but of course not free of charge.

easy handling, high stability

chassis with fine response

well-behaved engine

brakes without blame

active yet bearable seating position

infinitely long list of accessories.

Small tank (13l)

Good engine

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z900 vs BMW F 900 R

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z900 2018 and a BMW F 900 R 2020. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW F 900 R 2020 is about 8% higher. A Kawasaki Z900 2018 experiences a loss of 650 GBP in one year and 530 GBP in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 710 GBP and 710 GBP for a BMW F 900 R 2020. Compared to BMW F 900 R 2020 there are more Kawasaki Z900 2018 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 55 compared to 14. It takes less time to sell a BMW F 900 R with 82 days compared to 112 days for the Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 and 24 reviews for the BMW F 900 R since model year 2020. The first review for the Kawasaki Z900 was published on 11/11/2016 and now has more than 93,200 views. This compares to more than 154,700 views for the first review on BMW F 900 R published on 05/11/2019.

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW F 900 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental Motorradreifencalimoto GmbHMotorex AGSchuberth