Benelli BN 302 2021 vs. Royal Enfield Himalayan 410 2022
Benelli BN 302 2021
Royal Enfield Himalayan 410 2022
Loading...
Overview - Benelli BN 302 2021 vs Royal Enfield Himalayan 410 2022
Benelli BN 302 2021
Royal Enfield Himalayan 410 2022
Technical Specifications Benelli BN 302 2021 compared to Royal Enfield Himalayan 410 2022
Benelli BN 302 2021
Royal Enfield Himalayan 410 2022
Engine and Drive Train
Bore | Bore | 65 mm | Bore | 78 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stroke | Stroke | 45.2 mm | Stroke | 86 mm |
Engine power | Engine power | 38 HP | Engine power | 24 HP |
Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 10,000 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 6,500 rpm |
Torque | Torque | 27.4 Nm | Torque | 32 Nm |
Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 9,000 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 4,250 rpm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 12.1 | Compression Ratio | 9.5 |
Fuel system | Fuel system | Injection | Fuel system | Injection |
Starter | Starter | Electric | Starter | Electric |
Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath |
Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Chain |
Transmission Type | Transmission Type | Gearshift | Transmission Type | Gearshift |
Number of gears | Number of gears | 6 | Number of gears | 5 |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 2 | Cylinders | 1 |
Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
Valves | Valves | DOHC | Valves | OHV |
Cooling | Cooling | liquid | Cooling | Air |
Displacement | Displacement | 300 ccm | Displacement | 411 ccm |
Suspension Front
Front suspension | Front suspension | Upside-Down telescopic fork | Front suspension | Telescopic fork |
---|
Suspension Rear
Suspension | Suspension | Swing arm | Suspension | Swing arm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Shock absorber | Shock absorber | Monoshock | Shock absorber | Monoshock |
Material | Material | Steel | Material | Steel |
Chassis
Frame | Frame | Steel | Frame | Steel |
---|
Brakes Front
Type | Type | Double disk | Type | Single disk |
---|---|---|---|---|
Diameter | Diameter | 260 mm | Diameter | 300 mm |
Piston | Piston | Four pistons | Piston | Double piston |
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|---|---|---|---|
Diameter | Diameter | 240 mm | Diameter | 240 mm |
Piston | Piston | Double piston | Piston | Single piston |
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 120 mm | Front tyre width | 90 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 70 % | Front tyre height | 90 % |
Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch | Front tyre diameter | 21 inch |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 160 mm | Rear tyre width | 120 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 60 % | Rear tyre height | 90 % |
Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Length | Length | 2,130 mm | Length | 2,190 mm |
Width | Width | 800 mm | Width | 840 mm |
Height | Height | 1,120 mm | Height | 1,370 mm |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,405 mm | Wheelbase | 1,465 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 795 mm | Seat Height | 800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 16 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 15 l |
License compliancy | License compliancy | A2 | License compliancy | A2 |
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Benelli BN 302 vs Royal Enfield Himalayan 410
Price Benelli BN 302
Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.
Price Royal Enfield Himalayan 410
Model year
Current average market prices