Suzuki Burgman 650 Executive 2013 vs. Yamaha XMAX 400 2016

Suzuki Burgman 650 Executive 2013

Yamaha XMAX 400 2016

Overview - Suzuki Burgman 650 Executive 2013 vs Yamaha XMAX 400 2016

Suzuki Burgman 650 Executive 2013

Yamaha XMAX 400 2016

Technical Specifications Suzuki Burgman 650 Executive 2013 compared to Yamaha XMAX 400 2016

Suzuki Burgman 650 Executive 2013

Yamaha XMAX 400 2016

Suzuki Burgman 650 Executive 2013

Yamaha XMAX 400 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	75.5 mm	Bore	83 mm
Stroke	Stroke	71.3 mm	Stroke	73 mm
Engine power	Engine power	56 HP	Engine power	31.5 HP
Rpm at Max. Power	Rpm at Max. Power	7,000 rpm	Rpm at Max. Power	7,500 rpm
Torque	Torque	62 Nm	Torque	34 Nm
Rpm at Torque	Rpm at Torque	5,000 rpm	Rpm at Torque	6,000 rpm
Compression Ratio	Compression Ratio	11.2	Compression Ratio	10.6
Transmission Type	Transmission Type	Automatic	Transmission Type	Automatic
Cylinders	Cylinders	2	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	4-Stroke	Strokes	4-Stroke
Displacement	Displacement	638 ccm	Displacement	395 ccm

Brakes Front

Type	Type	Double disk	Type	Double disk

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre width	Front tyre width	120 mm	Front tyre width	120 mm
Front tyre height	Front tyre height	70 %	Front tyre height	70 %
Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	15 inch	Front tyre diameter	15 inch
Rear tyre width	Rear tyre width	160 mm	Rear tyre width	150 mm
Rear tyre height	Rear tyre height	60 %	Rear tyre height	70 %
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	14 inch	Rear tyre diameter	13 inch
Length	Length	2,260 mm	Length	2,190 mm
Width	Width	810 mm	Width	780 mm
Height	Height	1,435 mm	Height	1,385 mm
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,595 mm	Wheelbase	1,565 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	750 mm	Seat Height	785 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	15 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	14 l
License compliancy	License compliancy	A	License compliancy	A2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Suzuki Burgman 650 Executive 2013

Compared to other large scooters, the Burgman is still clearly positioned. The Burgman has an unbeaten standard equipment and thus offers the best price/performance ratio.

Integrated seat and prop heating

efficient, electrically adjustable windscreen

comfortable, dynamic ride

Control unit for the heated grips is poorly fitted

the on-board computer is difficult to operate.

Yamaha XMAX 400 2016

The Yamaha XMAX 400 was the big surprise of the comparison test. The 395cc engine is brisk, so the 100 km/h limit is quickly cracked. In addition, there is a comfortable seating position with a small backrest and plenty of room for the feet. Unfortunately, the chassis is a bit stiff, which can be felt in the back when you hit a manhole cover. However, as soon as it goes out on the country road, the XMAX works perfectly, which means that long distances should not be a problem.

Powerful engine

comfortable seating position

lots of storage space

nice look

nice instruments

Taut chassis

fuel filler cap could be prettier