BMW K 1300 GT 2009 vs. BMW K 1600 GT 2011
BMW K 1300 GT 2009
BMW K 1600 GT 2011
Overview - BMW K 1300 GT 2009 vs BMW K 1600 GT 2011
The BMW K 1300 GT model year 2009 and the BMW K 1600 GT model year 2011 are both touring motorcycles from BMW. While they share some similarities in terms of engine power, transmission, front and rear tire diameter, seat height, and fuel tank capacity, there are also notable differences between the two models.
Starting with the engine and drive train, both motorcycles have an inline engine type and the same engine power of 160 HP. However, the BMW K 1600 GT model year 2011 has a higher torque of 175 Nm compared to the 135 Nm of the BMW K 1300 GT model year 2009. Additionally, the displacement of the BMW K 1600 GT is larger at 1649 ccm, while the BMW K 1300 GT has a displacement of 1293 ccm.
In terms of suspension, the BMW K 1300 GT 2009 features a Paralever suspension, while the BMW K 1600 GT 2011 has a single swing arm suspension. This difference in suspension design may result in variations in the riding experience and handling characteristics of the motorcycles.
BMW K 1300 GT 2009
Both motorcycles have a double disk brake system at the front, providing reliable stopping power. This ensures safety and control during braking maneuvers.
In terms of dimensions and weights, both motorcycles have the same front and rear tire diameter of 17 inches. The seat height of the BMW K 1600 GT is slightly higher at 830 mm compared to the 820 mm of the BMW K 1300 GT. Both motorcycles have a fuel tank capacity of 24 liters, allowing for longer rides without frequent refueling.
Now let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each model. The BMW K 1300 GT 2009 is praised for its relaxed riding feel, confident turn-in behavior, and strong engine with lots of power. It also has an efficient windshield that provides adequate wind protection for the rider.
BMW K 1600 GT 2011
On the other hand, the BMW K 1600 GT 2011 boasts several strengths. It features dynamic traction control, which enhances safety and stability during acceleration. The adaptive cornering lights improve visibility while cornering, ensuring better safety in low-light conditions. The bike also offers a range of comfort accessories, allowing riders to customize their experience. The seating position is optimal for long rides, and the overall workmanship of the motorcycle is of high quality.
However, the BMW K 1300 GT 2009 has a weakness in handling disadvantages in bends, which may affect the overall agility and maneuverability of the motorcycle. On the other hand, the BMW K 1600 GT 2011 has a relatively high weight, which may impact its handling and maneuverability in certain situations. Additionally, riders should exercise caution with the traction point in special cases.
In conclusion, while both the BMW K 1300 GT 2009 and the BMW K 1600 GT 2011 are touring motorcycles with similar engine power and transmission, they have notable differences in torque, displacement, suspension, and weight. Each model has its own strengths and weaknesses, catering to different rider preferences and riding conditions.
Technical Specifications BMW K 1300 GT 2009 compared to BMW K 1600 GT 2011
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
BMW K 1300 GT 2009
The engine now produces 160 hp and 135 Nm. This should make further comments on driving performance superfluous. Sitting upright with the windshield extended, you can accelerate to over 250 km/h with absolute ease. Only at this point do you start to think a little about the poor engine - below this, it is simply completely underpowered, always and everywhere.
BMW K 1600 GT 2011
Electronically adjustable suspension, a state-of-the-art engine with electronics, ABS and DTC as well as high-quality chassis elements ensure that you can also have fun on extremely fast tours. The K 1600 GT is therefore not a motorbike for the fishing garage or the motorway enthusiast, but in fact a very normal motorbike with which you can inhale curves with pleasure.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW K 1300 GT vs BMW K 1600 GT
There are a few key differences between a BMW K 1300 GT 2009 and a BMW K 1600 GT 2011. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW K 1600 GT 2011 is about 7% higher. A BMW K 1300 GT 2009 experiences a loss of 40 GBP in one year and 1,320 GBP in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 3,560 GBP and 2,800 GBP for a BMW K 1600 GT 2011. Compared to BMW K 1600 GT 2011 there are more BMW K 1300 GT 2009 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 7 compared to 6. It takes less time to sell a BMW K 1300 GT with 65 days compared to 83 days for a BMW K 1600 GT. Since model year 2009 1000PS.de editors have written 3 reviews for the BMW K 1300 GT and 20 reviews for the BMW K 1600 GT since model year 2011. The first review for the BMW K 1300 GT was published on 10/10/2008 and now has more than 13,700 views. This compares to more than 9,900 views for the first review on BMW K 1600 GT published on 05/07/2010.
