Husqvarna SM 125 S 2012 vs. Yamaha WR 125 R 2016

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2012

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2012

Yamaha WR 125 R 2016

Yamaha WR 125 R 2016

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna SM 125 S 2012 vs Yamaha WR 125 R 2016

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2012

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2012

Yamaha WR 125 R 2016

Yamaha WR 125 R 2016

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 125 S 2012 compared to Yamaha WR 125 R 2016

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2012
Yamaha WR 125 R 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore54 mmBore52 mm
StrokeStroke54.5 mmStroke58.6 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio8.8 Compression Ratio11.2
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement124 ccmDisplacement124.7 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width80 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width150 mmRear tyre width110 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,470 mmWheelbase1,430 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height870 mmSeat Height930 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight113.5 kgDry Weight133 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9.5 lFuel Tank Capacity8.5 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna SM 125 S vs Yamaha WR 125 R

Price Husqvarna SM 125 S

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Yamaha WR 125 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG