BMW R 1200 R 2015 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW R 1200 R 2015

BMW R 1200 R 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2015

Loading...

Overview - BMW R 1200 R 2015 vs BMW S 1000 R 2015

The BMW R 1200 R 2015 and the BMW S 1000 R 2015 are both naked bikes, but they have some key differences in their technical specifications.

In terms of engine power, the BMW S 1000 R 2015 has a clear advantage with 160 HP compared to the BMW R 1200 R 2015's 125 HP. This extra power gives the S 1000 R a more thrilling and dynamic riding experience.

However, the BMW R 1200 R 2015 compensates for its slightly lower power with a higher torque of 125 Nm compared to the S 1000 R's 112 Nm. This means that the R 1200 R has better low-end power and acceleration.

The engine types also differ between the two models. The R 1200 R has a Boxer engine with 2 cylinders, while the S 1000 R has an In-line engine with 4 cylinders. This difference in engine configuration can affect the overall performance and feel of the bike.

BMW R 1200 R 2015

BMW R 1200 R 2015

In terms of suspension, the R 1200 R has a telescopic fork in the front and a Paralever suspension in the rear. On the other hand, the S 1000 R features an Upside-Down telescopic fork in the front and a swing arm suspension in the rear. The S 1000 R's suspension setup is more advanced and offers better handling and stability.

The chassis of the R 1200 R is made of steel and has a load-bearing engine frame type. In contrast, the S 1000 R has an aluminum frame with a twin tube design. The aluminum frame provides a lighter weight and better maneuverability for the S 1000 R.

Both bikes have double disk brakes with four pistons and radial technology in the front. This ensures powerful and responsive braking performance for both models.

BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2015

In terms of dimensions and weights, the R 1200 R has a wider front tire at 120 mm compared to the S 1000 R's 120 mm. The rear tire of the R 1200 R is also wider at 180 mm compared to the S 1000 R's 190 mm. The wheelbase of the R 1200 R is longer at 1515 mm, while the S 1000 R has a shorter wheelbase of 1439 mm. The seat height of the R 1200 R is lower at 790 mm, making it more accessible for shorter riders compared to the S 1000 R's 814 mm seat height. The R 1200 R is also heavier with a kerb weight of 231 kg compared to the S 1000 R's 207 kg. However, the R 1200 R has a larger fuel tank capacity of 18 liters compared to the S 1000 R's 17.5 liters.

In terms of strengths, the R 1200 R has a sporty look, a powerful engine, and a comfortable seating position. It also comes with ABS and traction control as standard, as well as two riding modes. On the other hand, the S 1000 R has a powerful and well-controllable engine, a powerful braking system, and a comparatively comfortable seating position.

However, both models have their weaknesses. The R 1200 R has many cool features that are only available at an extra cost, and its rev counter is poorly readable. The S 1000 R has irresistible but expensive optional extras, a hard chassis, and vibrations in the handlebars.

In conclusion, the BMW R 1200 R 2015 and the BMW S 1000 R 2015 are both impressive naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The R 1200 R offers a sporty look and a comfortable riding experience, while the S 1000 R provides a more thrilling and dynamic performance. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW R 1200 R 2015 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW R 1200 R 2015
BMW S 1000 R 2015

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeBoxerEngine typeIn line
BoreBore101 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke73 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power125 HPEngine power160 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,750 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque125 NmTorque112 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,500 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.5 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeAntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionProp shaftTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement1,170 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionParaleverSuspensionSwing arm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeLoad-bearing engineFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,165 mmLength2,057 mm
WidthWidth880 mmWidth845 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,515 mmWheelbase1,439 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height790 mmSeat Height814 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)231 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)207 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity18 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW R 1200 R 2015

BMW R 1200 R 2015

The predecessor was already able to be ridden in a sporty manner as well as convincing on tours, the new R 1200 R can do even more - thanks to the pannier system (of course at extra cost), travelling is still no problem, but it masters sport even better. Thanks to the now partially water-cooled boxer twin-cylinder engine, it is wonderfully agile - 125 hp may not seem like much on paper, but the engine pushes incredibly and behaves in a cultivated manner to boot. The chassis and brakes also score highly and the seating position is sporty and upright, covering a wide spectrum from wonderful fun to long-distance touring. Unfortunately, BMW also understands the trick with the surcharge list perfectly. The basic model is well equipped with ABS that can be deactivated, traction control that can also be deactivated and two driving modes, but many interesting gimmicks are almost obligatory - and of course drive the price way up.

Sporty look

powerful engine

good sound, comfortable seating position

ABS and traction control standard

two riding modes

Many cool features only available at extra cost

poorly readable rev counter

BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2015

With the BMW S 1000 R, you notice both the close relationship to the S 1000 RR superbike and the endeavour to equip the machine with a high degree of comfort for country roads and everyday use. Accordingly, the 1000cc four-cylinder power unit is brute and yet easily controllable, and the seating position is correspondingly sporty and comfortable. The fact that the S 1000 R is one of the most affordable power naked bikes is surprising and very pleasing, although one must not get hold of the list of optional extras - because thanks to the many irresistible features, it will certainly be more expensive.

Powerful and well controllable engine

powerful braking system

comparatively comfortable seating position.

irresistible but expensive optional extras

hard chassis

vibrations in the handlebars

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW R 1200 R vs BMW S 1000 R

There are a few key differences between a BMW R 1200 R 2015 and a BMW S 1000 R 2015. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW R 1200 R 2015 is about 4% higher. A BMW R 1200 R 2015 experiences a loss of 990 GBP in one year and 630 GBP in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 260 GBP and 610 GBP for a BMW S 1000 R 2015. Compared to BMW S 1000 R 2015 there are more BMW R 1200 R 2015 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 23 compared to 12. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 61 days compared to 69 days for the BMW R 1200 R. Since model year 2007 1000PS.de editors have written 27 reviews for the BMW R 1200 R and 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R since model year 2014. The first review for the BMW R 1200 R was published on 07/07/2006 and now has more than 14,900 views. This compares to more than 17,300 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 R published on 03/11/2013.

Price BMW R 1200 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG