Sherco 290 ST 2014 vs. Beta Evo 290 2T 2011

Sherco 290 ST 2014

Sherco 290 ST 2014

Beta Evo 290 2T 2011

Beta Evo 290 2T 2011

Loading...

Overview - Sherco 290 ST 2014 vs Beta Evo 290 2T 2011

Sherco 290 ST 2014

Sherco 290 ST 2014

Beta Evo 290 2T 2011

Beta Evo 290 2T 2011

Technical Specifications Sherco 290 ST 2014 compared to Beta Evo 290 2T 2011

Sherco 290 ST 2014
Beta Evo 290 2T 2011

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore76 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke60 mmStroke60.5 mm
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement272 ccmDisplacement289.1 ccm

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,322 mmWheelbase1,305 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height645 mmSeat Height660 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight68 kgDry Weight69 kg

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Sherco 290 ST vs Beta Evo 290 2T

Price Sherco 290 ST

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Beta Evo 290 2T

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH