Husqvarna TE 510 2010 vs. SWM RS 500 R 2020

Husqvarna TE 510 2010

Husqvarna TE 510 2010

SWM RS 500 R 2020

SWM RS 500 R 2020

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna TE 510 2010 vs SWM RS 500 R 2020

Husqvarna TE 510 2010

Husqvarna TE 510 2010

SWM RS 500 R 2020

SWM RS 500 R 2020

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 510 2010 compared to SWM RS 500 R 2020

Husqvarna TE 510 2010
SWM RS 500 R 2020

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore97 mmBore97 mm
StrokeStroke67.8 mmStroke67.8 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.9 Compression Ratio12.9
StarterStarterKickStarterElectric
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement501 ccmDisplacement501 ccm

Suspension Front

BrandBrandKayabaBrandKayaba

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandKayabaBrandKayaba

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,483 mmWheelbase1,485 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height963 mmSeat Height955 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.2 lFuel Tank Capacity8 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna TE 510 vs SWM RS 500 R

Price Husqvarna TE 510

Model year
Current average market prices

Price SWM RS 500 R

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental Motorradreifencalimoto GmbHMotorex AGSchuberth