Kawasaki Z650 2020 vs. Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020

Kawasaki Z650 2020

Kawasaki Z650 2020

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z650 2020 vs Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020

The Kawasaki Z650 2020 and the Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020 are both naked bikes with similar engine types and fuel systems. However, there are several notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020 has a significant advantage with 118 HP compared to the Kawasaki Z650 2020's 68.2 HP. The Triumph also has higher torque at 77 Nm compared to the Kawasaki's 65.7 Nm. This means that the Triumph offers more power and acceleration, making it a more thrilling ride.

Both bikes have liquid cooling and similar suspension systems with a swing arm and monoshock. However, the Triumph offers more adjustability with compression, preload, and rebound settings for the rear shock absorber. The Kawasaki only has preload adjustment. Additionally, the Triumph has an upside-down telescopic fork for the front suspension, which may provide better performance and handling.

Kawasaki Z650 2020

Kawasaki Z650 2020

In terms of chassis, the Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020 has an aluminum frame, while the Kawasaki Z650 2020 has a steel frame. The aluminum frame is typically lighter and offers better rigidity, which can contribute to improved handling and stability.

Both bikes have double disk brakes at the front, but the Triumph has larger diameter disks (310 mm compared to 300 mm) and four-piston calipers, which may provide better braking performance. The Triumph also has radial, monoblock technology for the front brakes, which can further enhance braking efficiency.

When it comes to advanced rider assistance systems, the Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020 offers more features. It includes ABS, riding modes, ride by wire, and traction control. The Kawasaki Z650 2020 only has ABS.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Triumph has a slightly larger wheelbase (1405 mm compared to 1410 mm) and seat height (825 mm compared to 790 mm). However, the Kawasaki has a smaller fuel tank capacity (15 l compared to 17.4 l).

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020

In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki Z650 2020 is praised for its powerful two-cylinder engine, aggressive intake noise, compact dimensions, low seat height, stable chassis, TFT display with connectivity, and grown-up look. On the other hand, the Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020 is praised for its wide usable rev range, active seating position, high stability, great gearbox with shift assistant, and first-class chassis.

In terms of weaknesses, the Kawasaki Z650 2020 is criticized for its front brake pressure point, potential discomfort for tall riders, and the Rideology App not being fully sophisticated. The Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020 is criticized for its traction control regulating early, a seat with little grip, and an outdated display.

Overall, the Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020 offers more power, advanced rider assistance systems, and a higher level of adjustability in the suspension. However, the Kawasaki Z650 2020 may be more suitable for riders who prioritize compact dimensions, a low seat height, and a more grown-up look. Ultimately, the choice between the two models depends on individual preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z650 2020 compared to Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020

Kawasaki Z650 2020
Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore83 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke60 mmStroke53.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power68.2 HPEngine power118 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power12,000 rpm
TorqueTorque65.7 NmTorque77 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,000 rpmRpm at Torque9,400 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10.8 Compression Ratio12.65
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement649 ccmDisplacement765 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel125 mmTravel115 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountDeflection
TravelTravel130 mmTravel134 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreloadAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTwin Tube
RakeRake65.5 degreeRake66.5 degree
TrailTrail100 mmTrail98.3 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter300 mmDiameter310 mm
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountSemi-SchwimmsattelShock mountFloating caliper
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyradial, Monoblock

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter220 mmDiameter220 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,055 mmLength2,055 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,405 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height790 mmSeat Height825 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15 lFuel Tank Capacity17.4 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z650 2020

Kawasaki Z650 2020

It's simply marvellous what Kawasaki has put together in a complete package with the new Z650. The technical components may not knock your socks off individually, but in combination they make for a pleasantly neutral motorbike that everyone will enjoy. No bitchy idiosyncrasies - simply a naked bike that works really well on winding country roads. Of course, the TFT display, which we don't find in the competition at the moment, is a plus, as is the grown-up look, which is strongly oriented towards the larger Z models. Only the pressure point of the front brake could have been more clearly defined - but you can't have everything in this price range.

powerful two-cylinder engine

aggressive intake noise

compact dimensions

low seat height

stable chassis

TFT display with connectivity

grown-up look

Front brake pressure point

probably uncomfortable for tall riders

Rideology Appn och not 100% sophisticated.

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020

The Street Triple R is well equipped for the occasional track day and delivers good performance. This is where the lively three-cylinder engine really comes into its own. But the agile Triumph is also great fun on country roads, as long as you keep it revved up. All in all, the clear price-performance winner of the Street Triple range.

Wide usable rev range

active seating position

high stability

great gearbox with shift assistant

first-class chassis.

Traction control regulates early

seat with little grip

display outdated

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z650 vs Triumph Street Triple 765 R

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z650 2020 and a Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 21. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Street Triple 765 R with 69 days compared to 80 days for the Kawasaki Z650. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 31 reviews for the Kawasaki Z650 and 15 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 765 R since model year 2017. The first review for the Kawasaki Z650 was published on 08/11/2016 and now has more than 25,000 views. This compares to more than 58,400 views for the first review on Triumph Street Triple 765 R published on 10/01/2017.

Price Kawasaki Z650

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Street Triple 765 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG