Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 vs. Yamaha XSR900 2016
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013
Yamaha XSR900 2016
Overview - Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 vs Yamaha XSR900 2016
The Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 and the Yamaha XSR900 2016 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, cooling systems, and frame types. However, there are notable differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the Speed Triple 1050 takes the lead with 135 HP compared to the XSR900's 115 HP. This gives the Triumph an advantage in terms of acceleration and top speed. Additionally, the Speed Triple produces more torque at 111 Nm compared to the XSR900's 87.5 Nm, providing better low-end power and overall performance.
Both bikes have three cylinders, which contribute to their unique sound and smoothness. However, the Speed Triple's engine displacement is larger at 1050 ccm, compared to the XSR900's 847 ccm. This larger displacement may result in a more robust and powerful engine performance.
In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front. However, the Speed Triple's Showa suspension elements have been criticized for being slightly uncomfortable, while the XSR900's suspension is well-tuned and provides a comfortable ride.
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013
Both bikes have aluminum frames, which offer stability and durability. The Speed Triple has a twin-tube frame, while the XSR900 also features a twin-tube frame design. These frames contribute to the bikes' stability and handling.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the XSR900 has a slightly longer wheelbase at 1440 mm compared to the Speed Triple's 1435 mm. The XSR900 also has a lower seat height at 815 mm compared to the Speed Triple's 825 mm. However, the Speed Triple has a larger fuel tank capacity at 17.5 liters, compared to the XSR900's 14 liters.
When it comes to tire sizes, both bikes have a front tire width of 120 mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. However, the Speed Triple has a wider rear tire at 190 mm, while the XSR900 has a slightly narrower rear tire at 180 mm.
Yamaha XSR900 2016
In terms of weight, the XSR900 is lighter at 188 kg compared to the Speed Triple's 214 kg. This lighter weight may contribute to the XSR900's agility and maneuverability.
In terms of strengths, the Speed Triple boasts a powerful three-cylinder engine, providing a sporty driving feel. Its upright seating position and stable frame contribute to a comfortable and confident riding experience. On the other hand, the XSR900 is praised for its greedy engine, well-tuned riding modes, and standard ABS and TC. Its authentic modern design and clean workmanship also add to its appeal.
In terms of weaknesses, the Speed Triple's Showa suspension elements have been criticized for being slightly uncomfortable. Additionally, some riders find the Speed Triple's handling to be stubborn. The XSR900, on the other hand, has a hard chassis and a seat that could be more comfortable. Some riders also feel that the speedblock design of the XSR900 is already present on many other models, which may reduce its uniqueness.
Overall, both the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 and the Yamaha XSR900 2016 have their strengths and weaknesses. The Speed Triple offers a more powerful engine and stable frame, while the XSR900 provides a well-tuned riding experience and modern design. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Technical Specifications Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 compared to Yamaha XSR900 2016
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013
More power, more kilos, more rubber . It is certainly not the most manageable, which makes climbing the Tyrolean mountains over hundreds of hairpin bends exhausting at times. But it is more mature than the Street Triple, knows how to glide along the valley smoothly and without getting on your nerves, and for some reason feels more trustworthy and secure.
Yamaha XSR900 2016
The XSR900 combines the performance of a sporty streetfighter with the look of a pleasing, cleanly finished retro naked bike. In doing so, the Japanese make use of their own history, which can be found bundled and without gaps in the archive of the design agency that has been working for Yamaha for 60 years. It adopts the virtues of the MT-09 and has mended some of its weaknesses. It rides more harmoniously, more controlled and, if desired, more relaxed. Only the comfort, and thus the rider, suffers from the tight chassis on bad roads. You have to be a little bit sensitive when it comes to a neo-classic.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050 vs Yamaha XSR900
There are a few key differences between a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 and a Yamaha XSR900 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 is about 17% higher. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 5. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 with 66 days compared to 77 days for a Yamaha XSR900. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 and 30 reviews for the Yamaha XSR900 since model year 2016. The first review for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 was published on 02/10/2007 and now has more than 16,200 views. This compares to more than 17,600 views for the first review on Yamaha XSR900 published on 25/11/2015.
