BMW S 1000 R 2017 vs. Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2023

BMW S 1000 R 2017

BMW S 1000 R 2017

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2023

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2023

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2017 vs Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2023

The BMW S 1000 R 2017 and the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2023 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, cooling systems, and suspension setups. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the BMW S 1000 R 2017 comes out on top with 165 HP compared to the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2023's 130 HP. The BMW also has a higher torque of 114 Nm compared to the Triumph's 80 Nm. This means that the BMW may offer more aggressive acceleration and overall performance.

Both bikes have fuel injection systems and liquid cooling, which contribute to efficient and reliable operation. The BMW has a larger displacement of 999 ccm compared to the Triumph's 765 ccm, which may result in slightly more power and torque.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arms at the rear. The shock absorbers are also monoshocks on both models. This setup provides good stability and handling for both bikes.

BMW S 1000 R 2017

BMW S 1000 R 2017

The chassis of both bikes is made of aluminum and has a twin tube design. This construction offers a good balance between strength and weight, contributing to the bikes' overall performance.

When it comes to brakes, both bikes have double disk brakes at the front with four pistons. However, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2023 has the added advantage of radial and monoblock technology, which may provide improved braking performance and control.

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, the BMW S 1000 R 2017 offers dynamic suspension, which eliminates the need for manual setup adjustments. On the other hand, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2023 comes equipped with riding modes, cornering ABS, ride by wire, a shift assistant with blipper, and traction control. This comprehensive electronic equipment provides enhanced safety and control for the rider.

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2023

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2023

In terms of dimensions and weights, the BMW has a slightly wider front tire width of 120 mm compared to the Triumph's 120 mm. The BMW also has a larger wheelbase of 1439 mm compared to the Triumph's 1399 mm. However, the Triumph has a higher seat height of 836 mm compared to the BMW's 814 mm. The BMW is slightly heavier with a kerb weight of 205 kg compared to the Triumph's 188 kg. Both bikes have fuel tank capacities of 17.5 l and 15 l respectively.

In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 R 2017 offers the best shift assistant in the naked bike league, powerful brakes, a wide range of equipment and accessory options, and a semi-active suspension that eliminates the need for setup adjustments. The Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2023 is praised for its engine, chassis, brakes, complete electronic equipment, build quality, and price.

However, the BMW S 1000 R 2017 has some weaknesses, including original equipment tires that may not be of the highest quality and an inactive seating position on the racetrack. The Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2023 has a minor weakness in that the speed display may be too subtle and difficult to read.

In conclusion, both the BMW S 1000 R 2017 and the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2023 are powerful and capable naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The BMW offers a more powerful engine and a wider range of equipment options, while the Triumph provides a competitive price and a comprehensive electronic equipment package. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2017 compared to Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2023

BMW S 1000 R 2017
Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2023

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke53.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power165 HPEngine power130 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power12,000 rpm
TorqueTorque114 NmTorque80 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque9,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio13.25
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement765 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter46 mmDiameter41 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial, Monoblock

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsDynamic suspensionAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsRiding modes, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Shift assistant with blipper, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WidthWidth845 mmWidth792 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,439 mmWheelbase1,399 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height814 mmSeat Height836 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)205 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)188 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity15 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2017

BMW S 1000 R 2017

BMW's universal talent also got better in 2017. The BMW offers the widest range of use and an exceptionally cultivated engine, a perfect gearbox and the best shift assistant in the field. It drives simply but quickly. You sit rather low in the vehicle.

Best shift assistant in the nakedbike league

Universal motorbike without any real weaknesses

Powerful engine, awesome sound, great handling

On the racetrack a slightly too inactive riding position

Very wide range of equipment and accessory options

Very powerful brakes

Semi-active suspension makes setup fiddling superfluous

Original equipment tyres not the finest premium goods

Inactive seating position on racetrack

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2023

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2023

The Triumph Street Triple 765 RS is a great motorbike, a very sporty naked bike, which can inspire above all sporty, precise motorcyclists. Extremely well-balanced, finely tuned and with strong feedback, the lightweight Englishwoman presents herself. A motorbike where the buyer can do absolutely nothing wrong. No wonder it is almost sold out!

the engine

the chassis

the brakes

the complete electronic equipment

the build quality

the price

the speed is difficult to read because it is almost too subtle in the display

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs Triumph Street Triple 765 RS

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2017 and a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2023. In terms of price, the actual average prices of both motorbikes are almost the same. Compared to Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2023 there are less BMW S 1000 R 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 22 compared to 37. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 97 days compared to 121 days for a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 26 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS since model year 2017. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 03/11/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 58,400 views for the first review on Triumph Street Triple 765 RS published on 10/01/2017.

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Street Triple 765 RS

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH