BMW F 700 GS 2016 vs. BMW R 1200 GS 2013

BMW F 700 GS 2016

BMW F 700 GS 2016

BMW R 1200 GS 2013

BMW R 1200 GS 2013

Loading...

Overview - BMW F 700 GS 2016 vs BMW R 1200 GS 2013

The BMW F 700 GS 2016 and the BMW R 1200 GS 2013 are both enduro motorcycles from BMW, but they have some key differences in terms of their technical specifications and strengths.

Starting with the technical specifications, the BMW F 700 GS 2016 is equipped with a 798cc engine, with a bore of 82mm and a stroke of 75.6mm. It has a power output of 75 HP and a torque of 77 Nm. The transmission is chain-driven, and it has a 2-cylinder configuration. The suspension at the rear is a swing arm, and the frame is made of steel. The front brakes are double disk, and it has a 19-inch front tire diameter and a 17-inch rear tire diameter. The wheelbase is 1562mm, and the seat height is 820mm. The kerb weight with ABS is 209kg, and it has a fuel tank capacity of 16 liters.

BMW F 700 GS 2016

BMW F 700 GS 2016

On the other hand, the BMW R 1200 GS 2013 is equipped with a larger 1170cc engine, with a bore of 101mm and a stroke of 73mm. It has a higher power output of 125 HP and a torque of 125 Nm. The transmission is prop shaft-driven, and it also has a 2-cylinder configuration. The suspension at the rear is a single swing arm, and the frame is made of steel. The front brakes are double disk, and it has a 19-inch front tire diameter and a 17-inch rear tire diameter. The wheelbase is slightly shorter at 1507mm, and the seat height is higher at 850mm. The kerb weight with ABS is heavier at 238kg, and it has a larger fuel tank capacity of 20 liters.

In terms of strengths, the BMW F 700 GS 2016 is praised for being very manageable and surprisingly powerful. It offers a comfortable seating position and has a low seat height, making it accessible for riders of different heights. It also has good brakes and is considered to have a good price point.

On the other hand, the BMW R 1200 GS 2013 is praised for its new engine and top chassis. It offers high comfort and is suitable for both traveling and everyday use. It is designed to be versatile and can handle various road conditions with ease.

BMW R 1200 GS 2013

BMW R 1200 GS 2013

As for weaknesses, the BMW F 700 GS 2016 is mentioned to have no specific weaknesses, although it is noted that its optics may not be to everyone's liking. On the other hand, no weaknesses are mentioned for the BMW R 1200 GS 2013.

In conclusion, the BMW F 700 GS 2016 and the BMW R 1200 GS 2013 are both capable enduro motorcycles from BMW, but they have some differences in terms of their technical specifications and strengths. The F 700 GS offers a more manageable and affordable option with good power, while the R 1200 GS offers a higher level of comfort and versatility for various riding needs.

Technical Specifications BMW F 700 GS 2016 compared to BMW R 1200 GS 2013

BMW F 700 GS 2016
BMW R 1200 GS 2013

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore82 mmBore101 mm
StrokeStroke75.6 mmStroke73 mm
Engine powerEngine power75 HPEngine power125 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,300 rpmRpm at Max. Power7,700 rpm
TorqueTorque77 NmTorque125 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque5,500 rpmRpm at Torque6,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeAntihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionProp shaft
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement798 ccmDisplacement1,170 ccm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSingle swing arm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTubular, Load-bearing engineFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engine

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFixed caliper

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height80 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter19 inchFront tyre diameter19 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width170 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,280 mmLength2,207 mm
WidthWidth855 mmWidth953 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,562 mmWheelbase1,507 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height820 mmSeat Height850 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)209 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)238 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16 lFuel Tank Capacity20 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW F 700 GS 2016

BMW F 700 GS 2016

The smaller of the two F GS sisters, the F 700 GS convinces with a successful overall performance. It looks like its big sister, but at its core it is more of a lively naked bike than a big enduro. The fact that the bike has outgrown the entry-level segment can be seen in the braking system - with two brake discs at the front, it is on a par with its big 800 sister and now decelerates just as confidently. In terms of the chassis, it convinces with good suspension comfort and at the same time a firm set-up in tight bends. Upgrading is never a problem with BMW; in addition to traction control, there is also the electronic suspension ESA for the F 700 GS.

Very manageable

surprisingly powerful

comfortable seating position

low seat height

good brakes

good price.

any optics

BMW R 1200 GS 2013

BMW R 1200 GS 2013

There are hardly any real points of attack in the market leader, which has become even more versatile - and faster.

New engine

Top chassis

High comfort

Suitable for travelling

Suitable for everyday use

Nix

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW F 700 GS vs BMW R 1200 GS

There are a few key differences between a BMW F 700 GS 2016 and a BMW R 1200 GS 2013. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW R 1200 GS 2013 is about 47% higher. A BMW F 700 GS 2016 experiences a loss of 230 GBP in one year and 360 GBP in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 240 GBP and 680 GBP for a BMW R 1200 GS 2013. Compared to BMW R 1200 GS 2013 there are less BMW F 700 GS 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 15 compared to 44. It takes less time to sell a BMW R 1200 GS with 60 days compared to 90 days for the BMW F 700 GS. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 7 reviews for the BMW F 700 GS and 98 reviews for the BMW R 1200 GS since model year 2005. The first review for the BMW F 700 GS was published on 02/07/2012 and now has more than 18,800 views. This compares to more than 19,100 views for the first review on BMW R 1200 GS published on 20/01/2004.

Price BMW F 700 GS

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW R 1200 GS

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG