BMW S 1000 R 2015 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2017

BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2015

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2015 vs Yamaha MT-09 2017

In terms of engine and drive train, the BMW S 1000 R 2015 and the Yamaha MT-09 2017 both have in-line engines. However, the BMW S 1000 R has a more powerful engine with 160 HP compared to the Yamaha MT-09's 115 HP. The BMW S 1000 R also has higher torque at 112 Nm compared to the Yamaha MT-09's 87.5 Nm. The BMW S 1000 R has 4 cylinders and a displacement of 999 ccm, while the Yamaha MT-09 has 3 cylinders and a displacement of 847 ccm.

In terms of suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks for the front suspension and swing arms for the rear suspension. They both also have monoshock shock absorbers. The chassis of both bikes is made of aluminum and has a twin tube frame.

BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2015

For the brakes, both bikes have double disk brakes at the front. However, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 has additional advanced rider assistance systems including ABS, quickshifter, and traction control, while the BMW S 1000 R 2015 only has dynamic suspension as an advanced rider assistance system.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have a front tire width of 120 mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. The BMW S 1000 R has a wider rear tire width of 190 mm compared to the Yamaha MT-09's 180 mm. Both bikes have a rear tire diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase of the BMW S 1000 R is slightly shorter at 1439 mm compared to the Yamaha MT-09's 1440 mm. The seat height of both bikes is similar, with the BMW S 1000 R at 814 mm and the Yamaha MT-09 at 815 mm. The BMW S 1000 R is slightly heavier with a kerb weight of 207 kg compared to the Yamaha MT-09's 193 kg. The fuel tank capacity of the BMW S 1000 R is also larger at 17.5 liters compared to the Yamaha MT-09's 14 liters.

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 R 2015 is praised for its powerful and well-controllable engine, powerful braking system, and comparatively comfortable seating position. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 is praised for its Öhlins suspension, Akrapovic exhaust system for improved optics and sound, Magura HC3 radial brake pump, Carbon2Race covers for grandiose optics, and effective combination of seat, footrests, and handlebar clamps.

In terms of weaknesses, the BMW S 1000 R 2015 is criticized for its expensive optional extras, hard chassis, and vibrations in the handlebars. The Yamaha MT-09 2017 is criticized for its financial outlay, requiring lots of working time, certain parts needing to be registered, and the ECU Flash not being road legal.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2015 compared to Yamaha MT-09 2017

BMW S 1000 R 2015
Yamaha MT-09 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke59.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power160 HPEngine power115 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque87.5 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque8,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio11.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement847 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsDynamic suspensionAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Quickshifter, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,057 mmLength2,075 mm
WidthWidth845 mmWidth815 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,439 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height814 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)207 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)193 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2015

With the BMW S 1000 R, you notice both the close relationship to the S 1000 RR superbike and the endeavour to equip the machine with a high degree of comfort for country roads and everyday use. Accordingly, the 1000cc four-cylinder power unit is brute and yet easily controllable, and the seating position is correspondingly sporty and comfortable. The fact that the S 1000 R is one of the most affordable power naked bikes is surprising and very pleasing, although one must not get hold of the list of optional extras - because thanks to the many irresistible features, it will certainly be more expensive.

Powerful and well controllable engine

powerful braking system

comparatively comfortable seating position.

irresistible but expensive optional extras

hard chassis

vibrations in the handlebars

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

In conclusion, after several stops throughout the season, I can look back on a great result. Both in terms of performance and looks, our MT-09 is perfect. The suspension was probably our most important issue. Where before there was clearly (too much) movement in the rear in fast corners, now it is ironed over without batting an eyelid. The STX 46 shock absorber is quite stiff in its basic configuration, but also manages to get through everyday life without being uncomfortable. Thanks to generous adjustment options, there is still room for individual preferences and uses. The function of the NIX 30 cartridge is also impressive. The response behaviour - especially under load - has improved significantly. There is now also much more reserve available when braking. Where before the fork went into block and the ABS triggered when braking hard with the original set-up, now the brakes simply continue to work effectively. In addition, the MT-09 now follows the intended line in the curve radius as if by itself - a pure pleasure. The sight and sound of the Akrapovic complete system are also pure joy, and the fact that it produces a few more horsepower is felt effectively, especially in the upper third of the rev range. The front wheel shoots even more willingly into the gallery in 2nd and 3rd gear.

Öhlins suspension an extreme enrichment

thanks to Akrapovic now optics and sound are right

Magura HC3 radial brake pump works divinely

Carbon2Race covers offer grandiose optics

combination of seat, footrests and handlebar clamps very effective

Financial outlay

lots of working time

certain parts must be registered

ECU Flash not road legal

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs Yamaha MT-09

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2015 and a Yamaha MT-09 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2015 is about 27% higher. A BMW S 1000 R 2015 experiences a loss of 260 GBP in one year and 610 GBP in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 820 GBP and 1,070 GBP for a Yamaha MT-09 2017. Compared to Yamaha MT-09 2017 there are more BMW S 1000 R 2015 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 12 compared to 10. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 61 days compared to 73 days for a Yamaha MT-09. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 since model year 2013. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 03/11/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 39,900 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-09 published on 10/06/2013.

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH