Triumph Speed Triple R 2016 vs. Yamaha XSR900 2022

Triumph Speed Triple R 2016

Triumph Speed Triple R 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2022

Yamaha XSR900 2022

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Speed Triple R 2016 vs Yamaha XSR900 2022

The Triumph Speed Triple R 2016 and the Yamaha XSR900 2022 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, inline three-cylinder engines. However, there are several differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Speed Triple R 2016 has a higher output with 140 HP compared to the XSR900 2022's 119 HP. The Speed Triple R also has higher torque at 112 Nm, while the XSR900 has 93 Nm of torque. This means that the Speed Triple R may offer more acceleration and power on the road.

Both bikes have liquid cooling and three cylinders, providing efficient and reliable performance. They also feature similar suspension setups, with upside-down telescopic forks at the front. However, the Speed Triple R is equipped with Öhlins suspension components, known for their excellent performance and adjustability. On the other hand, the XSR900 comes with Kayaba suspension components, which are also reputable but may not offer the same level of performance as Öhlins.

In terms of chassis, both bikes feature aluminum frames with a twin-tube design, providing a balance of rigidity and weight reduction. This contributes to better handling and maneuverability on the road.

Triumph Speed Triple R 2016

Triumph Speed Triple R 2016

Both bikes have double disc brakes at the front, but the Speed Triple R has larger 320 mm diameter discs compared to the XSR900's 298 mm discs. This may result in stronger and more effective braking performance on the Speed Triple R.

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, both bikes are equipped with ABS and traction control. However, the XSR900 2022 offers additional features such as riding modes, cornering ABS, ride by wire, cruise control, and a shift assistant with blipper. These features enhance the overall riding experience and provide more control and convenience for the rider.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the XSR900 has a slightly longer wheelbase at 1495 mm compared to the Speed Triple R's 1435 mm. This may result in better stability and straight-line performance for the XSR900. The seat height of the XSR900 is also slightly lower at 810 mm compared to the Speed Triple R's 825 mm. However, the XSR900 has a narrower rear tire width at 180 mm compared to the Speed Triple R's 190 mm.

In terms of weight, the XSR900 is lighter with a kerb weight of 193 kg compared to the Speed Triple R's 212 kg. This may contribute to better agility and handling for the XSR900.

Yamaha XSR900 2022

Yamaha XSR900 2022

In terms of fuel tank capacity, both bikes have similar capacities, with the Speed Triple R having a slightly larger tank at 15.5 liters compared to the XSR900's 15 liters.

In terms of strengths, the Speed Triple R stands out with its powerful and unique three-cylinder engine, strong brakes, well-functioning electronic features, excellent Öhlins suspension components, and traditional look. On the other hand, the XSR900 offers a powerful engine, a quickshifter as standard, good brakes, a comprehensive electronics package, sporty but everyday ergonomics, value for money, and a wide range of available accessories.

However, the Speed Triple R has some weaknesses, including somewhat sluggish handling and a high surcharge for the R version. The XSR900 also has its weaknesses, such as a hard seat and a low steering angle.

Overall, both the Triumph Speed Triple R 2016 and the Yamaha XSR900 2022 are impressive naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two will ultimately depend on the rider's preferences and priorities in terms of performance, features, and aesthetics.

Technical Specifications Triumph Speed Triple R 2016 compared to Yamaha XSR900 2022

Triumph Speed Triple R 2016
Yamaha XSR900 2022

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore79 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke71.4 mmStroke62.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power140 HPEngine power119 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque93 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,850 rpmRpm at Torque7,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio11.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,050 ccmDisplacement889 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandÖhlinsBrandKayaba

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSingle swing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
BrandBrandÖhlinsBrandKayaba

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter320 mmDiameter298 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Shift assistant with blipper, Cruise control, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,100 mmLength2,155 mm
WidthWidth795 mmWidth860 mm
HeightHeight1,110 mmHeight1,155 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,435 mmWheelbase1,495 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height825 mmSeat Height810 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)212 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)193 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15.5 lFuel Tank Capacity15 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Speed Triple R 2016

Triumph Speed Triple R 2016

Like its predecessor, the Speed Triple R delights with its high-quality, sensitively responding Öhlins suspension and its stunning looks. The design remains true to its line - which can only please the many fans. The engine's braking and responsiveness can hardly be complained about, but the lack of power on the competition and the somewhat sluggish handling can certainly be forgiven, after all, the Speed Triple is a classic with history and the design is legendary - which is much more important to true fans than the one or two extra horsepower.

Powerful and unique three-cylinder engine

brute brakes

well-functioning ewlectronic features

excellent Öhlins suspension components

traditional look.

somewhat sluggish handling

high surcharge for the R version

Yamaha XSR900 2022

Yamaha XSR900 2022

The XSR900 in no way wants to hide the fact that it uses the MT-09 as its basis. With a full electronics package, powerful three-cylinder and sporty chassis components, you can be incredibly sporty on this retro bike. Hopefully you'll just find a more comfortable seat in the accessories soon - because it's going to take a lot of stops on the standard seat.

powerful engine

quickshifter as standard

good brakes

electronics package

sporty but everyday ergonomics

value for money

many accessories available ex works

hard seat

low steering angle

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Speed Triple R vs Yamaha XSR900

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Speed Triple R 2016 and a Yamaha XSR900 2022. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha XSR900 with 97 days compared to 120 days for the Triumph Speed Triple R. Since model year 2012 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple R and 30 reviews for the Yamaha XSR900 since model year 2016. The first review for the Triumph Speed Triple R was published on 24/10/2011 and now has more than 11,100 views. This compares to more than 17,600 views for the first review on Yamaha XSR900 published on 25/11/2015.

Price Triumph Speed Triple R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha XSR900

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberth