Kawasaki Z900 2020 vs. Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z900 2020 vs Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

The Kawasaki Z900 2020 and the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 are both powerful naked bikes with impressive specifications. Let's compare these two models in terms of their engine and drive train, suspension, chassis, brakes, assistance systems, dimensions and weights, as well as their strengths and weaknesses.

In terms of engine and drive train, both bikes have inline engines with liquid cooling. However, the Kawasaki Z900 has a larger displacement of 948cc compared to the Triumph Street Triple's 765cc. The Z900 also has a higher engine power of 125.4 HP compared to the Street Triple's 123 HP. Additionally, the Z900 has a higher torque of 98.6 Nm compared to the Street Triple's 77 Nm. Both bikes have fuel injection systems and 4 cylinders.

Moving on to the suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspensions at the rear. The Z900 offers adjustment options for preload and rebound in both the front and rear suspension, while the Street Triple offers additional compression adjustment. The rear suspension of both bikes is made of aluminum.

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2020

In terms of chassis, the Z900 has a steel frame with a double cradle design, while the Street Triple has an aluminum frame with a twin tube design. Both frames provide stability and durability.

When it comes to brakes, both bikes have double disk brakes at the front with four pistons. The Z900 has a slightly smaller diameter of 300mm compared to the Street Triple's 310mm. The Z900 uses petal technology for its front brakes, while the Street Triple features radial monoblock technology.

In terms of assistance systems, both bikes offer advanced rider assistance systems such as ABS, riding modes, and traction control. However, the Street Triple has the additional feature of a quickshifter, allowing for smoother and faster gear shifts.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters. However, the Z900 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1450mm compared to the Street Triple's 1410mm. The seat height of the Z900 is also lower at 795mm compared to the Street Triple's 825mm.

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Now let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each bike. The Z900 has a powerful four-cylinder engine, great handling, good equipment, and aggressive looks. It also offers value for money. On the other hand, the Street Triple has a wonderfully sporty engine, a quickshifter as standard, and a throaty sound. It also boasts an excellent braking system with ABS and traction control that can be switched off. The Street Triple has cool looks and a low weight, making it agile and nimble on the road.

However, the Z900 has some weaknesses, including a somewhat tiring menu navigation and the absence of a quickshifter option. The Street Triple also has a complicated menu navigation system.

In conclusion, both the Kawasaki Z900 2020 and the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 are impressive naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Z900 offers a powerful engine and great handling, while the Street Triple excels in its sporty engine and excellent braking system. Ultimately, the choice between these two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z900 2020 compared to Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2020
Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke56 mmStroke53.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power125.4 HPEngine power123 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,700 rpm
TorqueTorque98.6 NmTorque77 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,700 rpmRpm at Torque10,800 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.8 Compression Ratio12.65
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement948 ccmDisplacement765 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel115 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountDeflection
TravelTravel140 mmTravel131 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound
MaterialMaterialAluminiumMaterialAluminium

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeTwin Tube
RakeRake65 degreeRake66.1 degree
TrailTrail105 mmTrail100 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter300 mmDiameter310 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFloating caliper
ActuationActuationHydraulicActuationHydraulic
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyradial, Monoblock

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter250 mmDiameter220 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Quickshifter, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,070 mmLength2,065 mm
HeightHeight1,065 mmHeight1,085 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,410 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height795 mmSeat Height825 mm
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2020

In terms of price-performance, the Kawasaki Z900 is hard to beat at the moment. With the perfectly tuned engine, the high-quality chassis components and the electronics added for 2020, this naked bike offers everything that sporty riders will be looking for. There is really nothing to complain about, even if the option of a quickshifter would have been a nice extra. Apart from that: great shot, Kawasaki!

powerful four-cylinder

great handling

good equipment

aggressive looks

value for money

Menu navigation somewhat tiring

missing quickshifter option

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

The top model among the Street Triples fully deserves the designation. Sportier in all respects than the R version, the RS presents itself on the country road as a fun machine that has few opponents to fear. Trackdays on the racetrack are also an issue, especially since the engine is very sharp, the Brembo brakes are super-sporty and the suspension with the Öhlins damper is wonderfully precise. The handling is a stunner anyway, the Street Triple is still the lightest in its class. The standard quickshifter further consolidates the position of the top model.

wonderfully sporty engine

quickshifter as standard

throaty sound

excellent braking system

ABS and traction control as standard and can be switched off

cool looks

low weight

complicated menu navigation

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z900 vs Triumph Street Triple 765 RS

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z900 2020 and a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Kawasaki Z900 2020 is about 4% higher. Compared to Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 there are more Kawasaki Z900 2020 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 34 compared to 4. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS with 67 days compared to 124 days for the Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 and 26 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS since model year 2017. The first review for the Kawasaki Z900 was published on 11/11/2016 and now has more than 93,200 views. This compares to more than 58,400 views for the first review on Triumph Street Triple 765 RS published on 10/01/2017.

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Street Triple 765 RS

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG