Can-Am Outlander L 570 Pro 2016 vs. CFMOTO CForce 820 V2 EFI 4×4 XL 2018

Can-Am Outlander L 570 Pro 2016

Can-Am Outlander L 570 Pro 2016

CFMOTO CForce 820 V2 EFI 4×4 XL 2018

CFMOTO CForce 820 V2 EFI 4×4 XL 2018

Loading...

Overview - Can-Am Outlander L 570 Pro 2016 vs CFMOTO CForce 820 V2 EFI 4×4 XL 2018

Can-Am Outlander L 570 Pro 2016

Can-Am Outlander L 570 Pro 2016

CFMOTO CForce 820 V2 EFI 4×4 XL 2018

CFMOTO CForce 820 V2 EFI 4×4 XL 2018

Technical Specifications Can-Am Outlander L 570 Pro 2016 compared to CFMOTO CForce 820 V2 EFI 4×4 XL 2018

Can-Am Outlander L 570 Pro 2016
CFMOTO CForce 820 V2 EFI 4×4 XL 2018

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeVEngine typeV
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement570 ccmDisplacement800 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionA-ArmFront suspensionA-Arm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionA-ArmSuspensionA-Arm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
ActuationActuationHydraulicActuationHydraulic

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width26 mmFront tyre width26 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height8 %Front tyre height9 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter12 inchFront tyre diameter14 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width26 mmRear tyre width26 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height10 %Rear tyre height11 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter12 inchRear tyre diameter14 inch
LengthLength2,110 mmLength2,320 mm
WidthWidth1,168 mmWidth1,180 mm
HeightHeight1,240 mmHeight1,360 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,295 mmWheelbase1,480 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight319 kgDry Weight354 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity20.5 lFuel Tank Capacity23 l

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental Motorradreifencalimoto GmbHSchuberthMotorex AG