BMW S 1000 R 2022 vs. KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

BMW S 1000 R 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2022

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2022 vs KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

The BMW S 1000 R 2022 and the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013 are both naked bikes that offer powerful performance and advanced rider assistance systems. However, there are several differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the BMW S 1000 R 2022 comes with a 165 HP engine, while the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013 boasts a slightly more powerful 173 HP engine. Both bikes offer impressive torque, with the BMW S 1000 R providing 114 Nm and the KTM 1290 Super Duke R delivering 144 Nm. The BMW S 1000 R has a 4-cylinder engine with a displacement of 999 ccm, while the KTM 1290 Super Duke R has a 2-cylinder engine with a larger displacement of 1301 ccm.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front. The BMW S 1000 R has an aluminum frame with a twin-tube design, while the KTM 1290 Super Duke R has a chromium-molybdenum frame with a tubular design. Both bikes have four-piston front brakes with radial technology, providing excellent stopping power. The KTM 1290 Super Duke R also features monoblock brakes, which further enhance its braking performance.

BMW S 1000 R 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2022

When it comes to advanced rider assistance systems, both bikes offer ABS and traction control. However, the BMW S 1000 R 2022 goes a step further and includes additional features such as hill start assist, riding modes, cornering ABS, ride by wire, quickshifter, and anti-wheelie control. These features provide enhanced safety and control for the rider.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters. The BMW S 1000 R has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1450 mm compared to the KTM 1290 Super Duke R's 1482 mm. The seat height of the BMW S 1000 R is 830 mm, while the KTM 1290 Super Duke R has a slightly higher seat height of 835 mm. The BMW S 1000 R has a kerb weight of 199 kg, while the KTM 1290 Super Duke R is slightly lighter at 189 kg. The KTM 1290 Super Duke R also has a larger fuel tank capacity of 18 liters compared to the BMW S 1000 R's 16.5 liters.

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 R 2022 offers a powerful engine, strong brakes, comfortable ergonomics, good standard equipment, and an extensive range of accessories. On the other hand, the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013 is praised for its precise handling, traction control, and powerful engine.

However, the BMW S 1000 R 2022 does have a few weaknesses, including a sluggish shift assistant and optics that are not 100% coherent. On the other hand, the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013 is criticized for its high price.

In conclusion, both the BMW S 1000 R 2022 and the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013 are impressive naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The BMW S 1000 R offers a powerful engine, advanced rider assistance systems, and a comfortable riding experience, while the KTM 1290 Super Duke R excels in terms of handling and traction control. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2022 compared to KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

BMW S 1000 R 2022
KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore80 mmBore108 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke71 mm
Engine powerEngine power165 HPEngine power173 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,870 rpm
TorqueTorque114 NmTorque144 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque6,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.5 Compression Ratio13.2
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeAntihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement1,301 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameChromium-molybdenum
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTubular

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFixed caliper
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial, Monoblock

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFixed caliper

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Hill start assist, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Quickshifter, Traction control, Anti-wheelieAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,482 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height830 mmSeat Height835 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)199 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)189 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16.5 lFuel Tank Capacity18 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2022

The seating position is sporty, but by no means uncomfortable, the brakes are powerful and the engine of the S 1000 R is at its best - perhaps even a little too homogeneous. There is also nothing to complain about on the riding side. Based on the pure performance data and the installed electronic features, the BMW probably has what it takes for the fastest lap time. And that on any kind of surface, because with the semi-active suspension you can eat up kilometre after kilometre on bad roads littered with potholes. Unfortunately, this feeling of superiority never really spilled over to the driver. Probably the downside of too much balance in all areas - at least in my Italophile eyes. The BMW lacked that certain something, the charisma, which is difficult to explain but arouses genuine emotions.

powerful engine

strong brakes

comfortable ergonomics

good standard equipment

extensive range of accessories

Sluggish shift assistant

optics not 100% coherent

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

With all the power and hard "Beast videos" from KTM, this horsepower monster is actually a 100% everyday bike for touring or going to work.

precise handling

traction control

powerful engine

High price

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs KTM 1290 Super Duke R

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2022 and a KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 22. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 71 days compared to 140 days for a KTM 1290 Super Duke R. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 65 reviews for the KTM 1290 Super Duke R since model year 2013. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 03/11/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 4,900 views for the first review on KTM 1290 Super Duke R published on 08/11/2012.

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price KTM 1290 Super Duke R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG