BMW S 1000 R 2020 vs. Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2009

BMW S 1000 R 2020

BMW S 1000 R 2020

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2009

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2009

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2020 vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2009

BMW S 1000 R 2020

BMW S 1000 R 2020

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2009

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2009

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2020 compared to Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2009

BMW S 1000 R 2020
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2009

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke71.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power165 HPEngine power132 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,250 rpm
TorqueTorque114 NmTorque105 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque7,550 rpm
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement1,050 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,057 mmLength2,115 mm
WidthWidth845 mmWidth780 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,439 mmWheelbase1,429 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height814 mmSeat Height815 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity18 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2020

BMW S 1000 R 2020

The seating position is sporty, but by no means uncomfortable, the brakes are powerful and the engine of the S 1000 R is at its best - perhaps even a little too homogeneous. There is also nothing to complain about on the riding side. Based on the pure performance data and the installed electronic features, the BMW probably has what it takes for the fastest lap time. And that on any kind of surface, because with the semi-active suspension you can eat up kilometre after kilometre on bad roads littered with potholes. Unfortunately, this feeling of superiority never really spilled over to the driver. Probably the downside of too much balance in all areas - at least in my Italophile eyes. The BMW lacked that certain something, the charisma, which is difficult to explain but arouses genuine emotions.

powerful engine

strong brakes

comfortable ergonomics

good standard equipment

extensive range of accessories

Sluggish shift assistant

optics not 100% coherent

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2009

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2009

Euphoria spread through the long bends. The Triple is a bit more expensive than some Nippon Nakeds with cheap chassis and you can feel it. It remains stable, you can open the throttle hard and you hit the line exactly.

More power

increased torque

reduced weight

agility

greatly improved geometry

precise and fast.

>100kg people might have space problems.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH