BMW F 800 R 2009 vs. Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

BMW F 800 R 2009

BMW F 800 R 2009

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

Loading...

Overview - BMW F 800 R 2009 vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

The BMW F 800 R model year 2009 and the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 model year 2010 are both naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience. However, there are several key differences between the two models.

In terms of engine performance, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 has a clear advantage. It boasts an inline three-cylinder engine with a displacement of 1050cc, producing an impressive 131 horsepower and 105 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the BMW F 800 R is equipped with an inline two-cylinder engine with a displacement of 798cc, delivering 87 horsepower and 86 Nm of torque. This means that the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 offers more power and torque, resulting in a more exhilarating ride.

When it comes to braking, both bikes feature four-piston front brakes, ensuring reliable stopping power. The dimensions of the front and rear tires are the same for both models, with a diameter of 17 inches. This provides stability and grip on the road, allowing for confident cornering.

BMW F 800 R 2009

BMW F 800 R 2009

In terms of dimensions and weights, there are some notable differences. The BMW F 800 R has a longer wheelbase of 1520mm, compared to the Triumph Speed Triple 1050's 1429mm wheelbase. This may affect the handling and maneuverability of the bikes, with the BMW potentially offering more stability at higher speeds. The seat height of the BMW is also slightly higher at 820mm, compared to the Triumph's 815mm seat height. Additionally, the BMW F 800 R has a dry weight of 177kg, while the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 weighs slightly more at 189kg.

In terms of fuel tank capacity, the BMW F 800 R has a larger capacity of 19 liters, compared to the Triumph Speed Triple 1050's 18 liters. This may result in longer riding range for the BMW, as it can hold more fuel.

When it comes to strengths, the BMW F 800 R is praised for its high-quality components, great engine performance, and good equipment options. It also offers a comfortable cockpit and a positive chassis, providing a smooth and enjoyable ride. Additionally, the BMW has a reputation for low fuel consumption, making it an economical choice for riders.

On the other hand, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 stands out with its increased power and torque, as well as reduced weight. It offers improved agility and geometry, allowing for precise and fast handling. These features make the Triumph an excellent choice for riders seeking a more dynamic and thrilling riding experience.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The BMW F 800 R is criticized for its high price, which may deter some potential buyers. Additionally, some riders find the first gear to be a little too long, affecting the bike's acceleration. The BMW's aesthetics are also mentioned as a weakness by some riders.

The Triumph Speed Triple 1050's main weakness is that it may not be suitable for riders weighing over 100kg, as they might experience space problems on the bike.

In conclusion, the BMW F 800 R 2009 and the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010 are both impressive naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The BMW offers high-quality components, a great engine, and good equipment options, while the Triumph provides more power, torque, and agility. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW F 800 R 2009 compared to Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

BMW F 800 R 2009
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore82 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke75.6 mmStroke71.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power87 HPEngine power131 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,250 rpm
TorqueTorque86 NmTorque105 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,000 rpmRpm at Torque7,550 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders3
DisplacementDisplacement798 ccmDisplacement1,050 ccm

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFixed caliper

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,145 mmLength2,115 mm
WidthWidth905 mmWidth780 mm
HeightHeight1,160 mmHeight1,120 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,520 mmWheelbase1,429 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height820 mmSeat Height815 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight177 kgDry Weight189 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity19 lFuel Tank Capacity18 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW F 800 R 2009

BMW F 800 R 2009

In the advertisements, the new BMW F 800 R sometimes comes across as a woman's motorbike. This does not do the bike an injustice, but the civilised engine, the low seat height and the smooth controls certainly suit petite ladies.

High-quality components

great engine

good equipment possible

cockpit

positive chassis

low consumption.

High price

first gear a little too long

optics.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

Euphoria spread through the long bends. The Triple is a bit more expensive than some Nippon Nakeds with cheap chassis and you can feel it. It remains stable, you can open the throttle hard and you hit the line exactly.

More power

increased torque

reduced weight

agility

greatly improved geometry

precise and fast.

>100kg people might have space problems.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW F 800 R vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050

There are a few key differences between a BMW F 800 R 2009 and a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 with 57 days compared to 58 days for the BMW F 800 R. Since model year 2009 1000PS.de editors have written 20 reviews for the BMW F 800 R and 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 since model year 2005. The first review for the BMW F 800 R was published on 10/10/2008 and now has more than 8,900 views. This compares to more than 16,200 views for the first review on Triumph Speed Triple 1050 published on 02/10/2007.

Price BMW F 800 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH