Yamaha XSR900 2022 vs. Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020

Yamaha XSR900 2022

Yamaha XSR900 2022

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha XSR900 2022 vs Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020

The Yamaha XSR900 2022 and the Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020 are both naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience.

In terms of engine performance, the Yamaha XSR900 takes the lead with its 119 HP engine, compared to the Triumph Street Triple's 118 HP. The Yamaha also boasts a higher torque of 93 Nm, while the Triumph offers 77 Nm. Both bikes have a 3-cylinder engine with liquid cooling, providing efficient heat dissipation during long rides.

When it comes to suspension, the Yamaha XSR900 features an Upside-Down telescopic fork from Kayaba at the front and a swing arm with a monoshock, also from Kayaba, at the rear. On the other hand, the Triumph Street Triple is equipped with a Showa Upside-Down telescopic fork at the front and a swing arm with a monoshock, also from Showa, at the rear. Both bikes have an aluminum frame with a twin tube design, ensuring a lightweight yet sturdy chassis.

Yamaha XSR900 2022

Yamaha XSR900 2022

In terms of braking power, the Yamaha XSR900 and the Triumph Street Triple both have double disk brakes at the front. However, the Triumph has a larger diameter of 310 mm compared to the Yamaha's 298 mm. This gives the Triumph an advantage in terms of braking performance and stopping power.

Both bikes come with advanced rider assistance systems such as ABS, riding modes, and traction control. However, the Yamaha XSR900 offers additional features such as cornering ABS, ride by wire, cruise control, and a shift assistant with a blipper. These additional features enhance the overall riding experience and provide added convenience.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Yamaha XSR900 has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1495 mm compared to the Triumph Street Triple's 1405 mm. This gives the Yamaha a slight advantage in terms of maneuverability and agility. However, the Triumph has a higher seat height of 825 mm compared to the Yamaha's 810 mm, which may be a consideration for riders with shorter inseams. The Triumph also has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17.4 liters, providing a longer range before needing to refuel.

In terms of strengths, the Yamaha XSR900 stands out with its powerful engine, quickshifter as standard, good brakes, and comprehensive electronics package. It also offers a sporty yet comfortable riding position and is considered a great value for money option. Additionally, the XSR900 has a wide range of accessories available ex works, allowing riders to customize their bike to their liking.

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020

The Triumph Street Triple 765 R, on the other hand, is praised for its wide usable rev range, active seating position, high stability, and excellent gearbox with a shift assistant. It also boasts a first-class chassis, providing a smooth and controlled ride.

In terms of weaknesses, the Yamaha XSR900 is noted for its hard seat and low steering angle, which may affect comfort and maneuverability in certain situations. On the other hand, the Triumph Street Triple has been criticized for its traction control system regulating early, a seat with little grip, and an outdated display. These weaknesses may be minor drawbacks for some riders, but they are worth considering when making a purchasing decision.

Overall, both the Yamaha XSR900 2022 and the Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020 are impressive naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience. The choice between the two ultimately comes down to personal preferences and priorities, such as desired features, riding style, and budget.

Technical Specifications Yamaha XSR900 2022 compared to Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020

Yamaha XSR900 2022
Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020
Show all
Same only
Differences
Yamaha XSR900 2022
Yamaha XSR900 2022
Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020
Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore78 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke62.1 mmStroke53.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power119 HPEngine power118 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power12,000 rpm
TorqueTorque93 NmTorque77 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,000 rpmRpm at Torque9,400 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio12.65
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement889 ccmDisplacement765 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandKayabaBrandShowa
TravelTravel130 mmTravel115 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
BrandBrandKayabaBrandShowa
TravelTravel137 mmTravel134 mm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube
RakeRake65 degreeRake66.5 degree
TrailTrail108 mmTrail98.3 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter298 mmDiameter310 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter245 mmDiameter220 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Shift assistant with blipper, Cruise control, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,155 mmLength2,055 mm
WidthWidth860 mmWidth775 mm
HeightHeight1,155 mmHeight1,065 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase1,405 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height810 mmSeat Height825 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15 lFuel Tank Capacity17.4 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha XSR900 2022

Yamaha XSR900 2022

The XSR900 in no way wants to hide the fact that it uses the MT-09 as its basis. With a full electronics package, powerful three-cylinder and sporty chassis components, you can be incredibly sporty on this retro bike. Hopefully you'll just find a more comfortable seat in the accessories soon - because it's going to take a lot of stops on the standard seat.

powerful engine

quickshifter as standard

good brakes

electronics package

sporty but everyday ergonomics

value for money

many accessories available ex works

hard seat

low steering angle

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020

The Street Triple R is well equipped for the occasional track day and delivers good performance. This is where the lively three-cylinder engine really comes into its own. But the agile Triumph is also great fun on country roads, as long as you keep it revved up. All in all, the clear price-performance winner of the Street Triple range.

Wide usable rev range

active seating position

high stability

great gearbox with shift assistant

first-class chassis.

Traction control regulates early

seat with little grip

display outdated

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha XSR900 vs Triumph Street Triple 765 R

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha XSR900 2022 and a Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 59. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Street Triple 765 R with 69 days compared to 97 days for the Yamaha XSR900. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 30 reviews for the Yamaha XSR900 and 15 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 765 R since model year 2017. The first review for the Yamaha XSR900 was published on 25/11/2015 and now has more than 17,600 views. This compares to more than 58,400 views for the first review on Triumph Street Triple 765 R published on 10/01/2017.

Price Yamaha XSR900

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Street Triple 765 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen