Husqvarna WR 250 2013 vs. Yamaha WR 250R 2016

Husqvarna WR 250 2013

Husqvarna WR 250 2013

Yamaha WR 250R 2016

Yamaha WR 250R 2016

Loading...

Technical Specifications Husqvarna WR 250 2013 compared to Yamaha WR 250R 2016

Husqvarna WR 250 2013
Yamaha WR 250R 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore66 mmBore77 mm
StrokeStroke72 mmStroke53.6 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio8.4 Compression Ratio11.8
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement249 ccmDisplacement250 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width80 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height100 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width120 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,465 mmWheelbase1,420 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height975 mmSeat Height930 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9.5 lFuel Tank Capacity7.6 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna WR 250 vs Yamaha WR 250R

Price Husqvarna WR 250

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Yamaha WR 250R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG