BMW S 1000 R 2015 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2021

BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2015

Yamaha MT-09 2021

Yamaha MT-09 2021

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2015 vs Yamaha MT-09 2021

The BMW S 1000 R 2015 and the Yamaha MT-09 2021 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine performance, the BMW S 1000 R 2015 boasts a more powerful engine with 160 HP compared to the Yamaha MT-09 2021's 119 HP. The BMW also has a higher torque of 112 Nm compared to the Yamaha's 93 Nm. The BMW has a 4-cylinder engine with a displacement of 999cc, while the Yamaha has a 3-cylinder engine with a displacement of 889cc.

BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2015

Both bikes feature upside-down telescopic fork front suspension and swing arm rear suspension with a monoshock absorber. They also have aluminum frames with twin tube construction. The BMW has a double disk front brake system, while the Yamaha shares the same feature.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the BMW has a slightly wider front tire width of 120mm compared to the Yamaha's 120mm. Both bikes have a 17-inch front tire diameter. The rear tire width of the BMW is 190mm, while the Yamaha has a slightly narrower rear tire width of 180mm. Both bikes have a 17-inch rear tire diameter. The wheelbase of the BMW is slightly longer at 1439mm compared to the Yamaha's 1430mm. The seat height of the BMW is 814mm, while the Yamaha has a slightly higher seat height of 825mm. The BMW also has a higher kerb weight of 207kg compared to the Yamaha's 189kg. The BMW has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17.5 liters, while the Yamaha has a smaller fuel tank capacity of 14 liters.

In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 R 2015 is praised for its powerful and well-controllable engine, powerful braking system, and comparatively comfortable seating position. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-09 2021 is praised for its lack of load change reactions, even more pressure from the center, over-complete electronics package, great working quickshifter, comfortably integrated seating position, successful chassis, lively handling, and enormous riding pleasure.

Yamaha MT-09 2021

Yamaha MT-09 2021

However, both bikes also have their weaknesses. The BMW S 1000 R 2015 is criticized for its expensive optional extras, hard chassis, and vibrations in the handlebars. The Yamaha MT-09 2021 is criticized for its polarizing look, small TFT display, somewhat indirect front wheel feel, and the fact that cruise control is only available in the SP variant.

In conclusion, while both the BMW S 1000 R 2015 and the Yamaha MT-09 2021 are powerful naked bikes with similar technical specifications, they have some notable differences in terms of engine performance, dimensions, weights, and strengths and weaknesses. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2015 compared to Yamaha MT-09 2021

BMW S 1000 R 2015
Yamaha MT-09 2021

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke62.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power160 HPEngine power119 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque93 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque7,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio11.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement889 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsDynamic suspensionAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Quickshifter, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,057 mmLength2,090 mm
WidthWidth845 mmWidth795 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,439 mmWheelbase1,430 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height814 mmSeat Height825 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)207 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)189 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2015

With the BMW S 1000 R, you notice both the close relationship to the S 1000 RR superbike and the endeavour to equip the machine with a high degree of comfort for country roads and everyday use. Accordingly, the 1000cc four-cylinder power unit is brute and yet easily controllable, and the seating position is correspondingly sporty and comfortable. The fact that the S 1000 R is one of the most affordable power naked bikes is surprising and very pleasing, although one must not get hold of the list of optional extras - because thanks to the many irresistible features, it will certainly be more expensive.

Powerful and well controllable engine

powerful braking system

comparatively comfortable seating position.

irresistible but expensive optional extras

hard chassis

vibrations in the handlebars

Yamaha MT-09 2021

Yamaha MT-09 2021

The ingredients for the 2021 update are right: More power, more equipment, more electronics, less weight. If you take a look at the key data of the latest MT-09, including its over-complete standard equipment, "mid-range naked bike" almost sounds a bit pejorative. The Japanese engineers have made improvements exactly where they were needed. The swaying chassis is now a thing of the past and the load change reactions have also been eliminated from the revised three-cylinder engine. The additional power paired with a little more pressure in the mid-range gives a sovereign riding feeling. The MT-09 offers a lot of equipment and enormous riding pleasure at a very attractive price. If you like the look, you can buy it without hesitation.

No more load change reactions

even more pressure from the centre

over-complete electronics package

great working quickshifter

comfortably integrated seating position

successful chassis

lively handling

enormous riding pleasure.

Polarising look

small TFT display

somewhat indirect front wheel feel

cruise control only available in SP variant

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs Yamaha MT-09

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2015 and a Yamaha MT-09 2021. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2015 is about 14% higher. Compared to Yamaha MT-09 2021 there are less BMW S 1000 R 2015 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 12 compared to 19. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 61 days compared to 112 days for a Yamaha MT-09. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 since model year 2013. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 03/11/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 39,900 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-09 published on 10/06/2013.

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG