Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 vs. Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 vs Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

The Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 and the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. They both have an in-line three-cylinder engine with a power output of 135 HP and a torque of 111 Nm. The engine displacement is also the same at 1050 ccm, and both bikes have liquid cooling.

In terms of suspension, the Speed Triple 1050 2013 has a Showa upside-down telescopic fork at the front and a Showa suspension at the rear. The Speed Triple R 2012, on the other hand, has an Öhlins telescopic fork at the front and an Öhlins suspension at the rear. Both bikes have adjustable compression and rebound settings for the suspension.

The chassis of both bikes is made of aluminum and has a twin tube frame. The front brakes of both bikes have four pistons and are of the radial technology, with Brembo being the brand. The front brakes of the Speed Triple R 2012 also have monoblock technology, which provides additional stability and precision.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters, as well as the same wheelbase, seat height, and fuel tank capacity.

The Speed Triple 1050 2013 has a powerful three-cylinder engine, which provides a sporty driving feel. The upright seating position and stable frame contribute to a comfortable and confident riding experience.

The Speed Triple R 2012, on the other hand, has a flawless racing chassis that offers very precise handling. The bike's inspiring looks, great engine, and stable brakes make it a desirable choice for riders looking for a high-performance naked bike.

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

However, the Speed Triple 1050 2013 has some weaknesses. The Showa suspension elements can be slightly uncomfortable, and the bike's handling can be stubborn at times.

Similarly, the Speed Triple R 2012 has its weaknesses. It requires wide radii for turns, making it somewhat complicated to ride in tight corners. Additionally, there may be some weaknesses in terms of comfort.

In conclusion, both the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 and the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 are powerful and capable naked bikes. The Speed Triple 1050 2013 offers a sporty driving feel and a stable frame, while the Speed Triple R 2012 has a flawless racing chassis and great engine performance. However, both bikes have their weaknesses, such as uncomfortable suspension and complicated handling in the case of the Speed Triple 1050 2013, and the need for wide radii and potential comfort issues in the case of the Speed Triple R 2012.

Technical Specifications Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 compared to Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013
Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore79 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke71.4 mmStroke71.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power135 HPEngine power135 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,400 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,400 rpm
TorqueTorque111 NmTorque111 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,750 rpmRpm at Torque7,750 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders3
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,050 ccmDisplacement1,050 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork
BrandBrandShowaBrandÖhlins
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandShowaBrandÖhlins
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial, Monoblock
BrandBrandBremboBrandBrembo

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper
BrandBrandNissinBrandNissin

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,100 mmLength2,100 mm
WidthWidth795 mmWidth795 mm
HeightHeight1,110 mmHeight1,110 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,435 mmWheelbase1,435 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height825 mmSeat Height825 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

More power, more kilos, more rubber . It is certainly not the most manageable, which makes climbing the Tyrolean mountains over hundreds of hairpin bends exhausting at times. But it is more mature than the Street Triple, knows how to glide along the valley smoothly and without getting on your nerves, and for some reason feels more trustworthy and secure.

Powerful three-cylinder engine

sporty driving feel

upright seating

stable frame.

Showa suspension elements slightly uncomfortable

stubborn handling.

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

The R rides as precisely and calmly as never before. It is guaranteed to keep its nerve even when the rider may have long since thrown it away. The disadvantage of the compact powerhouse is that the radii have to be a little wider and the course a little faster so that the true Queen of England can also play the 4 aces up her sleeve.

Flawless racing chassis

very precise

relatively stable

inspiring looks

great engine

stable brakes

Requires wide radii

Somewhat complicated to ride in turns

Weaknesses in comfort

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050 vs Triumph Speed Triple R

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 and a Triumph Speed Triple R 2012. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 5. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 with 66 days compared to 78 days for a Triumph Speed Triple R. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 and 16 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple R since model year 2012. The first review for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 was published on 02/10/2007 and now has more than 16,200 views. This compares to more than 11,100 views for the first review on Triumph Speed Triple R published on 24/10/2011.

Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Speed Triple R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG