Yamaha WR250F 2005 vs. Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Yamaha WR250F 2005

Yamaha WR250F 2005

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha WR250F 2005 vs Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Yamaha WR250F 2005

Yamaha WR250F 2005

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Technical Specifications Yamaha WR250F 2005 compared to Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Yamaha WR250F 2005
Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power38 HPEngine power50 HP
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement249 ccmDisplacement449 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,475 mmWheelbase1,495 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height998 mmSeat Height885 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight106 kgDry Weight121 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity10 lFuel Tank Capacity9 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha WR250F 2005

Yamaha WR250F 2005

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

In everyday use, experienced pilots immediately feel at ease and have a lot of fun zipping through the traffic. However, inexperienced pilots are somewhat overwhelmed by the spontaneous and sporty characteristics.

Supermoto geometry

handy chassis

high performance

rev-happy engine

Bicycle speedometer looks a bit rancid

reliability

not suitable for everyday use

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha WR250F vs Husqvarna SM 450 R

Price Yamaha WR250F

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna SM 450 R

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH