Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010 vs. Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010 vs Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

The Triumph Speed Triple 1050 model year 2010 and the Triumph Speed Triple R model year 2012 are both naked bikes with similar engine specifications. They both have an in-line engine type, 3 cylinders, and a displacement of 1050cc. However, there are several differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Speed Triple R 2012 has a slight advantage with 135 HP compared to the Speed Triple 1050 2010's 131 HP. The Speed Triple R also has a higher torque of 111 Nm compared to the 105 Nm of the Speed Triple 1050.

Both models have liquid cooling systems and aluminum frames with a twin tube design. The front suspension on the Speed Triple 1050 is an upside-down telescopic fork from Showa, while the Speed Triple R features a telescopic fork from Öhlins. Both suspensions have compression and rebound adjustment. The rear suspension on both models is from Showa, but the Speed Triple R has the added feature of preload adjustment.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

When it comes to braking, both models have four-piston front calipers with radial technology. However, the Speed Triple R has the advantage of monoblock calipers, which provide even greater braking performance.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Speed Triple R has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1435mm compared to the Speed Triple 1050's 1429mm. The seat height of the Speed Triple R is also slightly higher at 825mm compared to the 815mm of the Speed Triple 1050. The Speed Triple R has a slightly smaller fuel tank capacity of 17.5 liters compared to the 18 liters of the Speed Triple 1050.

In terms of strengths, the Speed Triple 1050 2010 offers more power and increased torque compared to the Speed Triple R 2012. It also has reduced weight, making it more agile and offering improved geometry. The Speed Triple 1050 is known for its precise and fast performance.

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

On the other hand, the Speed Triple R 2012 has a flawless racing chassis and is known for its very precise handling. It offers relatively stable performance and has inspiring looks. The engine of the Speed Triple R is also highly regarded, and it features stable brakes with the added advantage of monoblock calipers.

In terms of weaknesses, the Speed Triple 1050 2010 may have space problems for individuals weighing over 100kg. The Speed Triple R 2012 requires wider radii when turning and may be somewhat complicated to ride in turns. It also has weaknesses in terms of comfort.

Overall, both the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010 and the Speed Triple R 2012 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two models would depend on the rider's preferences and priorities, whether they prioritize power and agility or precise handling and racing performance.

Technical Specifications Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010 compared to Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010
Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore79 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke71.4 mmStroke71.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power131 HPEngine power135 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,250 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,400 rpm
TorqueTorque105 NmTorque111 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,550 rpmRpm at Torque7,750 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders3
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,050 ccmDisplacement1,050 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork
BrandBrandShowaBrandÖhlins
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandShowaBrandÖhlins
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial, Monoblock

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper
BrandBrandNissinBrandNissin

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,115 mmLength2,100 mm
WidthWidth780 mmWidth795 mm
HeightHeight1,120 mmHeight1,110 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,429 mmWheelbase1,435 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height825 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity18 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

Euphoria spread through the long bends. The Triple is a bit more expensive than some Nippon Nakeds with cheap chassis and you can feel it. It remains stable, you can open the throttle hard and you hit the line exactly.

More power

increased torque

reduced weight

agility

greatly improved geometry

precise and fast.

>100kg people might have space problems.

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

The R rides as precisely and calmly as never before. It is guaranteed to keep its nerve even when the rider may have long since thrown it away. The disadvantage of the compact powerhouse is that the radii have to be a little wider and the course a little faster so that the true Queen of England can also play the 4 aces up her sleeve.

Flawless racing chassis

very precise

relatively stable

inspiring looks

great engine

stable brakes

Requires wide radii

Somewhat complicated to ride in turns

Weaknesses in comfort

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050 vs Triumph Speed Triple R

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010 and a Triumph Speed Triple R 2012. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 with 57 days compared to 78 days for a Triumph Speed Triple R. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 and 16 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple R since model year 2012. The first review for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 was published on 02/10/2007 and now has more than 16,200 views. This compares to more than 11,100 views for the first review on Triumph Speed Triple R published on 24/10/2011.

Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Speed Triple R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH