Yamaha R1 2010 vs. Kawasaki Ninja H2R 2015

Yamaha R1 2010

Yamaha R1 2010

Kawasaki Ninja H2R 2015

Kawasaki Ninja H2R 2015

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha R1 2010 vs Kawasaki Ninja H2R 2015

The Yamaha R1 model year 2010 and the Kawasaki Ninja H2 R model year 2015 are both supersport motorcycles that offer impressive performance and features.

Starting with the Yamaha R1 2010, it comes equipped with a 998cc engine that delivers 181 horsepower and 115.5 Nm of torque. The engine has a bore of 78 mm and a stroke of 52.2 mm. It features a 4-cylinder configuration with 4 valves per cylinder and DOHC technology. The R1 2010 has an aluminum frame, specifically a Deltabox frame, which provides excellent stability and handling. The front suspension consists of an upside-down telescopic fork, while the front brakes are double disk type. The bike has a wheelbase of 1415 mm and a seat height of 835 mm. It also has a fuel tank capacity of 18 liters.

Yamaha R1 2010

Yamaha R1 2010

On the other hand, the Kawasaki Ninja H2 R 2015 boasts a more powerful engine with 310 horsepower and 165 Nm of torque. The engine has a displacement of 998cc, a bore of 76 mm, and a stroke of 55 mm. Similar to the Yamaha R1 2010, it has a 4-cylinder configuration with 4 valves per cylinder and DOHC technology. The Ninja H2 R 2015 features a steel frame, specifically a tubular frame, which provides good rigidity and stability. The front suspension consists of a telescopic fork, and the front brakes are also double disk type. It has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1450 mm and a slightly lower seat height of 830 mm. The fuel tank capacity is 17 liters.

In terms of strengths, the Yamaha R1 2010 is praised for its strong engine and sophisticated engine character. It also has an optimal braking system and a comfortable seating position. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Ninja H2 R 2015 is known for its quality of workmanship, power, torque, and traction. It has surprisingly low maintenance requirements considering its 310 horsepower engine. The acceleration of the Ninja H2 R is often described as being out of this world. The engine control is also highly regarded, and the bike features high-quality details in all corners. The paintwork is superb, and the brakes are excellent. The Ninja H2 R also offers great stability in every situation.

Kawasaki Ninja H2R 2015

Kawasaki Ninja H2R 2015

However, both motorcycles have their weaknesses. The Yamaha R1 2010 is criticized for its suboptimal suspension elements and slightly weak traction. It also has a relatively high weight. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Ninja H2 R 2015 has some drawbacks such as engine response at the first few degrees of throttle and understeer at high speeds. It also requires higher maintenance than normal bikes due to its high-performance nature. Additionally, the sound of the Ninja H2 R's engine can be polarizing, with some loving it and others finding it problematic on race tracks.

In conclusion, the Yamaha R1 2010 and the Kawasaki Ninja H2 R 2015 are both impressive supersport motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Yamaha R1 2010 offers a strong engine and comfortable seating position, while the Kawasaki Ninja H2 R 2015 boasts exceptional power, torque, and traction. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on individual preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Yamaha R1 2010 compared to Kawasaki Ninja H2R 2015

Yamaha R1 2010
Kawasaki Ninja H2R 2015

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore78 mmBore76 mm
StrokeStroke52.2 mmStroke55 mm
Engine powerEngine power181 HPEngine power310 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power12,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power14,000 rpm
TorqueTorque115.5 NmTorque165 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque10,000 rpmRpm at Torque12,500 rpm
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement998 ccmDisplacement998 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeDeltaboxFrame typeTubular

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height60 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height65 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,070 mmLength2,070 mm
WidthWidth715 mmWidth770 mm
HeightHeight1,130 mmHeight1,160 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,415 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height835 mmSeat Height830 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity18 lFuel Tank Capacity17 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha R1 2010

Yamaha R1 2010

The current engine in the R1 scores points above all with its unmistakable sound, very transparent response and linear power delivery. In terms of peak power, however, Yamaha had to cut back a little.

Strong engine

sophisticated engine character

optimal braking system

comfortable seating position.

Suboptimal suspension elements

low peak power

slightly weak traction

high weight.

Kawasaki Ninja H2R 2015

Kawasaki Ninja H2R 2015

The Kawasaki crew had a vision. To build a motorbike that creates excitement and pushes into completely new dimensions in terms of performance and technology. This vision has succeeded. The 326 hp machine can be piloted by experienced riders without acute danger to their lives. The intensity of the acceleration is indescribable. But the perfect overall appearance of the motorbike with countless high-quality details is also thrilling. Compared to normal motorbikes, the H2 R has its weaknesses in throttle response and line precision at high speeds. All in all, the H2 R is the most fascinating motorbike of all time for the test pilot and can be recommended to petrol junkies with a clear conscience. The H2 R is available for the price of a well-equipped German-made premium estate - only with "a little" more adrenaline.

Quality of workmanship

Power, torque, traction, surprisingly low maintenance requirements in the 300 hp league

Acceleration - as if from another star

Engine control is basically very good

If you are taller than 185 cm, be sure to try it out - it could be tight for your feet

High-quality details in all corners

Over 300 hp, but still the highest quality standards from series production

Superb paintwork

Excellent brakes

Great stability in every situation.

Engine response at the first few degrees of throttle

Understeer at high speeds

Higher maintenance than normal bikes

The sound is infernal - you can love it, but it can also cause problems on race tracks.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha R1 vs Kawasaki Ninja H2R

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha R1 2010 and a Kawasaki Ninja H2 R 2015. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 5. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha R1 with 53 days compared to 2,298 days for a Kawasaki Ninja H2 R. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 80 reviews for the Yamaha R1 and 13 reviews for the Kawasaki Ninja H2 R since model year 2015. The first review for the Yamaha R1 was published on 28/04/2003 and now has more than 3,900 views. This compares to more than 413,000 views for the first review on Kawasaki Ninja H2 R published on 04/11/2014.

Price Yamaha R1

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Ninja H2R

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG