Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2018 vs. Royal Enfield Scram 411 2022

Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2018

Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2018

Royal Enfield Scram 411 2022

Royal Enfield Scram 411 2022

Loading...

Overview - Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2018 vs Royal Enfield Scram 411 2022

The Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 model year 2018 and the Royal Enfield Scram 411 model year 2022 are both naked bikes from the Royal Enfield brand. While they share some similarities, there are also notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Interceptor 650 boasts a more powerful engine with 47 HP compared to the Scram 411's 24 HP. The Interceptor also has higher torque at 52 Nm, while the Scram 411 has 32 Nm of torque. This means that the Interceptor offers more acceleration and overall power.

Both bikes feature fuel injection systems for efficient fuel delivery. However, the Interceptor has a larger engine displacement at 648 ccm compared to the Scram 411's 411 ccm. This indicates that the Interceptor has a larger and potentially more powerful engine.

Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2018

Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2018

In terms of cooling, the Interceptor has an oil-air cooling system, while the Scram 411 relies on air cooling. Oil-air cooling generally provides better heat dissipation, which can be beneficial for longer rides or in hot climates.

Both bikes have telescopic fork front suspensions and swing arm rear suspensions. However, the Scram 411 features a monoshock rear shock absorber, which may provide improved handling and comfort compared to the Interceptor's dual shock absorbers. Additionally, the Scram 411 has a double cradle frame type, which can offer enhanced stability and rigidity compared to the Interceptor's load-bearing engine frame.

In terms of braking, both bikes have single disk front brakes with double piston calipers. The Interceptor has a larger front brake diameter at 320 mm compared to the Scram 411's 300 mm. This suggests that the Interceptor may offer better braking performance.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Scram 411 has slightly larger front and rear tire diameters at 19 inches and 17 inches, respectively, compared to the Interceptor's 18-inch front and rear tires. The Scram 411 also has a longer wheelbase at 1465 mm compared to the Interceptor's 1400 mm. However, the Interceptor has a higher seat height at 804 mm compared to the Scram 411's 795 mm. Both bikes have similar fuel tank capacities, with the Scram 411 having a slightly larger capacity at 15 liters compared to the Interceptor's 13.7 liters.

Royal Enfield Scram 411 2022

Royal Enfield Scram 411 2022

In terms of strengths, the Interceptor 650 is praised for its agile and refined powerplant, comfortable seating position, stable handling, good brakes, and successful old school look. It also offers a classic round instrument design and a reasonable price. On the other hand, the Scram 411 is noted for its very attractive price, nice sound, turn by turn navigation as standard, nice design, solid to good workmanship, and very easy handling.

In terms of weaknesses, the Interceptor 650 is criticized for its ABS not being quite sensitive and the lack of electronic features for those who may need them. The Scram 411, on the other hand, has a lax front brake, somewhat low top speed, and peak power.

Overall, the Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2018 and the Royal Enfield Scram 411 2022 have their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The Interceptor offers a more powerful engine and potentially better braking performance, while the Scram 411 boasts a more attractive price, turn by turn navigation, and easy handling. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2018 compared to Royal Enfield Scram 411 2022

Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2018
Royal Enfield Scram 411 2022

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore78 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke67.8 mmStroke86 mm
Engine powerEngine power47 HPEngine power24 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,100 rpmRpm at Max. Power6,500 rpm
TorqueTorque52 NmTorque32 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque4,000 rpmRpm at Torque4,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio9.5 Compression Ratio9.5
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectric, KickStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears5
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
ValvesValvesOHVValvesOHV
CoolingCoolingOil-airCoolingAir
DisplacementDisplacement648 ccmDisplacement411 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork
TravelTravel110 mmTravel190 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberDual ShockShock absorberMonoshock
MaterialMaterialSteelMaterialSteel

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeLoad-bearing engineFrame typeDouble cradle

Brakes Front

TypeTypeSingle diskTypeSingle disk
DiameterDiameter320 mmDiameter300 mm
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter240 mmDiameter240 mm

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width100 mmFront tyre width100 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter18 inchFront tyre diameter19 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width130 mmRear tyre width120 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height70 %Rear tyre height90 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,122 mmLength2,160 mm
WidthWidth789 mmWidth840 mm
HeightHeight1,165 mmHeight1,165 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,400 mmWheelbase1,465 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height804 mmSeat Height795 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity13.7 lFuel Tank Capacity15 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2018

Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2018

While the Continental GT 650 is not a completely new model visually (there is already the Conti GT 535), an Interceptor 650 with a two-cylinder engine is now coming onto the market for the first time in almost 50 years. The styling therefore skilfully reflects the flair of the 1960s, while the technology is up to date. You won't find any electronic features, but the parallel twin-cylinder engine with 48 hp and 53 Newton metres of torque is surprisingly agile and the handling is very neutral. The Brembo brake is also pleasing with good dosing and the Pirelli tyres do not show any weaknesses. The seating position is very comfortable, so if you don't want to ride your Interceptor 650 so sportily, you can cruise comfortably - it can do that very well too.

Agile and refined powerplant

cool two-cylinder sound

comfortable seating position

stable handling

good brakes

successful old school look

classic round instruments

reasonable price.

ABS not quite sensitive, no electronic features - in case anyone needs them...

Royal Enfield Scram 411 2022

Royal Enfield Scram 411 2022

A lot of stylish motorbike at a fair price? Yes, that's what the Royal Enfield Scram 411 offers. The workmanship is adequate or even better for the price class. Actually, the Scram only lacks a little more peak power to be able to overtake smoothly on country roads and a slightly more precise front brake. The rest fits!

very attractive price

nice sound

turn by turn navigation as standard

nice design, solid to good workmanship

very easy handling

lax front brake

somewhat low top speed and peak power

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 vs Royal Enfield Scram 411

There are a few key differences between a Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2018 and a Royal Enfield Scram 411 2022. It takes less time to sell a Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 with 13 days compared to 67 days for a Royal Enfield Scram 411. Since model year 2018 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 and 4 reviews for the Royal Enfield Scram 411 since model year 2022. The first review for the Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 was published on 28/09/2018 and now has more than 133,500 views. This compares to more than 35,900 views for the first review on Royal Enfield Scram 411 published on 13/05/2022.

Price Royal Enfield Interceptor 650

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Royal Enfield Scram 411

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH