Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2014
Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017
BMW S 1000 R 2014
Overview - Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 vs BMW S 1000 R 2014
The Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 and the BMW S 1000 R 2014 are both naked bikes that offer impressive performance and advanced features.
Starting with the engine and drive train, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 is equipped with an in-line 3-cylinder engine that delivers 123 horsepower and 77 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 features an in-line 4-cylinder engine that produces a higher power output of 160 horsepower and 112 Nm of torque. This gives the BMW an advantage in terms of raw power and performance.
In terms of suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks at the front and a swing arm with a monoshock at the rear. The chassis of both bikes is made of aluminum and features a twin tube frame design. This ensures a lightweight and agile ride for both motorcycles.
Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017
When it comes to braking, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 is equipped with double disk brakes at the front with four pistons and radial monoblock technology. The BMW S 1000 R 2014 also has double disk brakes at the front with four pistons and radial technology. Both bikes offer excellent braking performance, ensuring safety and control.
In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 comes with ABS, riding modes, ride by wire, quickshifter, and traction control. The BMW S 1000 R 2014 features dynamic suspension as its advanced rider assistance system. Both bikes offer electronic aids that enhance the riding experience and provide added safety.
In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front tire width of 120 mm and front tire diameter of 17 inches. However, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a slightly wider rear tire width of 190 mm compared to the Triumph's 180 mm. The wheelbase of the BMW is also slightly longer at 1439 mm compared to the Triumph's 1410 mm. The seat height of the BMW is slightly lower at 814 mm compared to the Triumph's 825 mm. Both bikes have a similar fuel tank capacity, with the BMW having a slightly larger capacity of 17.5 liters compared to the Triumph's 17.4 liters.
In terms of strengths, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 has a wonderfully sporty engine, a quickshifter as standard, a throaty sound, an excellent braking system, and ABS and traction control that can be switched off. It also has a cool look and a low weight, which contributes to its agile handling.
BMW S 1000 R 2014
On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a sporty chassis, extreme power and performance, very good electronic helpers, and a terrific price/performance ratio. It is fast and comfortable on both the racetrack and country roads.
In terms of weaknesses, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 has a complicated menu navigation, which may be a drawback for some riders. The BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a slightly rough engine running and a seat that is relatively high, which may not be suitable for shorter riders. Additionally, the design of the BMW is subjective and may be a matter of taste.
In conclusion, both the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 and the BMW S 1000 R 2014 are impressive naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Triumph offers a sporty engine and excellent braking system, while the BMW provides extreme power and performance. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Technical Specifications Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2014
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017
The top model among the Street Triples fully deserves the designation. Sportier in all respects than the R version, the RS presents itself on the country road as a fun machine that has few opponents to fear. Trackdays on the racetrack are also an issue, especially since the engine is very sharp, the Brembo brakes are super-sporty and the suspension with the Öhlins damper is wonderfully precise. The handling is a stunner anyway, the Street Triple is still the lightest in its class. The standard quickshifter further consolidates the position of the top model.
BMW S 1000 R 2014
Brutal power, smooth, almost perfect, electronics, it only gets better with the HP4. Now BMW dominates the 1000cc naked bike class after the superbikes.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Street Triple 765 RS vs BMW S 1000 R
There are a few key differences between a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 and a BMW S 1000 R 2014. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2014 is about 16% higher. A Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 experiences a loss of 20 GBP in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 600 GBP for a BMW S 1000 R 2014. Compared to BMW S 1000 R 2014 there are less Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 4 compared to 19. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS with 67 days compared to 70 days for a BMW S 1000 R. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 26 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS and 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R since model year 2014. The first review for the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS was published on 10/01/2017 and now has more than 58,400 views. This compares to more than 17,300 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 R published on 03/11/2013.
