Husqvarna FE 250 2015 vs. Husqvarna FC 250 2016
Husqvarna FE 250 2015
Husqvarna FC 250 2016
Overview - Husqvarna FE 250 2015 vs Husqvarna FC 250 2016
The Husqvarna FE 250 model year 2015 and the Husqvarna FC 250 model year 2016 are both high-quality motorcycles designed for different purposes.
Starting with the technical specifications, both models have the same bore and stroke measurements of 78 mm and 52.3 mm respectively. They also have a single cylinder, 4-stroke engine with a displacement of around 250 cc. However, there are some differences in the compression ratio, with the FE 250 having a ratio of 12.8 and the FC 250 having a higher ratio of 13.9.
In terms of the starter, the FE 250 uses a kick starter while the FC 250 has an electric starter, making it more convenient for riders. Both models have a chain transmission system and utilize upside-down telescopic forks from WP for their front suspension. The rear suspension also features a deflection shock mount from WP.
Husqvarna FE 250 2015
In terms of the chassis, both models have a steel frame with a central tube design. This provides strength and stability to the motorcycles.
Moving on to the dimensions and weights, there are some slight variations between the two models. The FE 250 has a front tire width of 90 mm and a rear tire width of 120 mm, while the FC 250 has a front tire width of 80 mm and a rear tire width of 100 mm. The front tire diameter is the same for both models at 21 inches, but the FE 250 has a rear tire diameter of 18 inches while the FC 250 has a slightly larger rear tire diameter of 19 inches. The wheelbase of the FC 250 is slightly longer at 1495 mm compared to the 1482 mm of the FE 250. The seat height is also higher in the FC 250 at 992 mm compared to the 970 mm of the FE 250. The dry weight of the FC 250 is slightly lighter at 104.1 kg compared to the 107.5 kg of the FE 250. Both models have a fuel tank capacity of around 7.5-9.5 liters.
When it comes to strengths, the FE 250 2015 is praised for being very easy to ride, with the engine responding well over the entire rev range. It is also described as light and manageable, but not as nervous as the 350 model. The FE 250 is also equipped with high-quality components.
On the other hand, the FC 250 2016 does not have any specific strengths mentioned in the provided data.
Husqvarna FC 250 2016
In terms of weaknesses, the FE 250 2015 is said to struggle with riding errors on steep slopes or in front of large obstacles. Additionally, it is mentioned that the 250 model is almost as expensive as the larger enduros, despite positioning itself as an entry-level enduro.
The FC 250 2016 is listed as being reserved for factory teams only, suggesting that it may not be readily available to the general public. It is also described as expensive.
In conclusion, both the Husqvarna FE 250 2015 and the Husqvarna FC 250 2016 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The FE 250 is praised for its ease of use and high-quality components, while the FC 250 seems to have limited information available. It is important for potential buyers to consider their specific needs and preferences when choosing between these two models.
Technical Specifications Husqvarna FE 250 2015 compared to Husqvarna FC 250 2016
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Husqvarna FE 250 2015
During the test, we rode the FE250 in standard condition and then also with the Rekluse automatic clutch. The automatic clutch really suits the FE250, which is easy to ride and easy on the eyes. The accessory is probably also perfectly suited to the bike's target group. All in all, the FE250 is a motorbike that can do much more than one would expect at first glance. In very hard sections, however, it is the less talented riders who would like to have a little more torque.
Husqvarna FC 250 2016
Since only factory riders and selected journalists will ever ride these motocrossers, it makes no sense to write a conclusion. Basically, what we are talking about here is the best and fastest motorbike stuff in off-road. Every part is handpicked and supplied and machined by the best companies. Riders can have their vehicles 100% customised to their needs and to the track at hand. From that point of view, you can no longer speak of any weaknesses here.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna FE 250 vs Husqvarna FC 250
There are a few key differences between a Husqvarna FE 250 2015 and a Husqvarna FC 250 2016. It takes less time to sell a Husqvarna FC 250 with 34 days compared to 56 days for the Husqvarna FE 250. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 7 reviews for the Husqvarna FE 250 and 5 reviews for the Husqvarna FC 250 since model year 2014. The first review for the Husqvarna FE 250 was published on 27/03/2015 and now has more than 48,700 views. This compares to more than 6,800 views for the first review on Husqvarna FC 250 published on 03/11/2013.
