Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 vs. Kawasaki Z900 2019

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Loading...

Overview - Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 vs Kawasaki Z900 2019

When comparing the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 and the Kawasaki Z900 2019, there are several factors to consider.

Starting with the technical specifications, both bikes have an in-line, liquid-cooled engine with four cylinders and fuel injection. However, there are differences in power and torque. The Suzuki GSX-S1000 has a higher engine power of 149 HP compared to the Kawasaki Z900's 125.4 HP. Similarly, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 has a higher torque of 106 Nm compared to the Kawasaki Z900's 98.6 Nm. In terms of displacement, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 has a larger engine with 999 ccm, while the Kawasaki Z900 has a slightly smaller engine with 948 ccm.

Moving on to the suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and a swing arm with a monoshock at the rear. The Suzuki GSX-S1000 offers more adjustment options for the front suspension, including compression, preload, and rebound. The rear suspension of both bikes can be adjusted for preload and rebound.

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

In terms of the chassis, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 has an aluminum frame with a twin tube design, while the Kawasaki Z900 has a steel frame with a double cradle design. Both frames provide stability and support for the bike.

When it comes to braking, both bikes have double disk brakes at the front with a diameter of 310 mm for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 and 300 mm for the Kawasaki Z900. Both bikes also have four-piston calipers and ABS for advanced rider assistance.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have a front tire width of 120 mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. However, there are differences in the rear tire width, with the Suzuki GSX-S1000 having a wider rear tire at 190 mm compared to the Kawasaki Z900's 180 mm. Both bikes have a wheelbase of around 1450-1460 mm and a seat height of around 795-815 mm. The kerb weight of both bikes is similar, with the Suzuki GSX-S1000 weighing 209 kg with ABS and the Kawasaki Z900 weighing 210 kg with ABS.

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Now let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each bike. The Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 is praised for its powerful engine, good braking control, stable and sensitive chassis, comfortable seating position, and relatively low price. On the other hand, it is criticized for its front end appearance and a throttle response that can be too aggressive at lower rev ranges.

The Kawasaki Z900 2019 is praised for its light and natural handling with high stability, silky engine with full pull from mid revs, high chassis transparency, great feedback, comfortable seating position, and fair price. However, it is criticized for its TFT display being mounted too low, cumbersome menu operation, and rearview mirrors offering modest visibility.

In conclusion, both the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 and the Kawasaki Z900 2019 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Suzuki GSX-S1000 offers a more powerful engine and more adjustable suspension, while the Kawasaki Z900 provides a smoother handling experience and a comfortable seating position. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 compared to Kawasaki Z900 2019

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016
Kawasaki Z900 2019

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore73.4 mm
StrokeStroke59 mmStroke56 mm
Engine powerEngine power149 HPEngine power125.4 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpm
TorqueTorque106 NmTorque98.6 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,500 rpmRpm at Torque7,700 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.2 Compression Ratio11.8
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Throttle BoreThrottle Bore44 mmThrottle Bore36 mm
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement948 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter43 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel120 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentPreload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountDeflection
TravelTravel130 mmTravel140 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentPreload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeDouble cradle

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter310 mmDiameter300 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyPetal

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter250 mmDiameter250 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height50 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,115 mmLength2,070 mm
WidthWidth795 mmWidth820 mm
HeightHeight1,080 mmHeight1,065 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,460 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height795 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)209 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)210 kg
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Some might be surprised that after waiting so long, Suzuki did not launch the ultimate, uncompromising power naked bike. Instead, the Suzuki GSX-S 1000 with its 149 hp seems almost too well-behaved. But once you ride it on the race track, you quickly realise that the engine is far more powerful in real life and that the rest of the performance of the chassis and braking system is also impressive. In return, it also offers a large portion of everyday and practical suitability - not bad ingredients when you have to cover everything from everyday to race track with a single bike.

Powerful engine

good braking control

stable and sensitive chassis

comfortable seating position

relatively low price.

Front end looks too good

toxic throttle response in the lower rev range

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Fortunately, the new Kawasaki Z900 has lost none of its character through the use of electronics. It is and remains a playful mid-range naked bike, which at the same time masters the brisk pace on the country road magnificently. The riding pleasure and suitability for everyday use are high, the now installed riding aids offer a plus in safety. Your opponents will have a really hard time from now on.

Light and natural handling with high stability

Silky engine with full pull from mid revs

High chassis transparency, great feedback

Sitting position with feel-good factor

Fair price

TFT display mounted too low

Cumbersome menu operation

Rear view mirrors offer modest visibility

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Suzuki GSX-S1000 vs Kawasaki Z900

There are a few key differences between a Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 and a Kawasaki Z900 2019. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Kawasaki Z900 2019 is about 8% higher. A Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 experiences a loss of 90 GBP in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 230 GBP for a Kawasaki Z900 2019. Compared to Kawasaki Z900 2019 there are less Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 10 compared to 40. It takes less time to sell a Suzuki GSX-S1000 with 109 days compared to 116 days for a Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2015 1000PS.de editors have written 36 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 and 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 since model year 2017. The first review for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 was published on 27/09/2014 and now has more than 17,100 views. This compares to more than 93,200 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z900 published on 11/11/2016.

Price Suzuki GSX-S1000

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental Motorradreifencalimoto GmbHSchuberthMotorex AG