Kawasaki Z900 2019 vs. Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z900 2019 vs Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020

The Kawasaki Z900 2019 and the Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020 are both naked bikes with similar engine types and fuel systems. However, there are several differences between the two models in terms of performance, features, and design.

In terms of engine power, the Kawasaki Z900 2019 has a higher output with 125.4 HP compared to the Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020's 118 HP. The Z900 also has a higher torque of 98.6 Nm compared to the Street Triple's 77 Nm. This means that the Z900 may offer more acceleration and power on the road.

Both bikes have a liquid cooling system and a swing arm suspension at the rear. However, the Z900 has a steel frame while the Street Triple has an aluminum frame. The Z900's frame type is a double cradle, while the Street Triple's frame type is a twin tube. These differences in frame material and type may affect the overall weight and handling of the bikes.

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Kawasaki Z900 2019

In terms of braking, both bikes have double disk brakes at the front with four pistons. However, the Street Triple has a larger brake diameter of 310 mm compared to the Z900's 300 mm. The Street Triple also features radial and monoblock technology, which may provide better braking performance and control.

When it comes to advanced rider assistance systems, the Street Triple has more features. It includes ABS, riding modes, ride by wire, and traction control. The Z900 only has ABS as its advanced rider assistance system.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters. However, the Z900 has a longer wheelbase of 1450 mm compared to the Street Triple's 1405 mm. The seat height of the Street Triple is also slightly higher at 825 mm compared to the Z900's 795 mm.

Now, let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each bike. The Z900 2019 is praised for its light and natural handling, high stability, and silky engine with full pull from mid revs. It also offers a high chassis transparency and great feedback, making it a joy to ride. The sitting position of the Z900 is comfortable and provides a feel-good factor. Additionally, the Z900 is considered to have a fair price.

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020

On the other hand, the Street Triple 765 R 2020 is commended for its wide usable rev range, active seating position, high stability, and great gearbox with a shift assistant. It also has a first-class chassis, which enhances its overall performance and handling.

However, the Z900 has some weaknesses, including a TFT display mounted too low, cumbersome menu operation, and rearview mirrors that offer modest visibility. The Street Triple's weaknesses include traction control that regulates early, a seat with little grip, and an outdated display.

In conclusion, both the Kawasaki Z900 2019 and the Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Z900 offers a powerful engine and a comfortable riding position, while the Street Triple provides advanced rider assistance systems and a high-performance chassis. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on personal preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z900 2019 compared to Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2019
Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke56 mmStroke53.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power125.4 HPEngine power118 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power12,000 rpm
TorqueTorque98.6 NmTorque77 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,700 rpmRpm at Torque9,400 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.8 Compression Ratio12.65
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement948 ccmDisplacement765 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel115 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountDeflection
TravelTravel140 mmTravel134 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound
MaterialMaterialAluminiumMaterialAluminium

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeTwin Tube
RakeRake65 degreeRake66.5 degree
TrailTrail105 mmTrail98.3 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter300 mmDiameter310 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFloating caliper
ActuationActuationHydraulicActuationHydraulic
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyradial, Monoblock

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter250 mmDiameter220 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,070 mmLength2,055 mm
WidthWidth820 mmWidth775 mm
HeightHeight1,065 mmHeight1,065 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,405 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height795 mmSeat Height825 mm
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Fortunately, the new Kawasaki Z900 has lost none of its character through the use of electronics. It is and remains a playful mid-range naked bike, which at the same time masters the brisk pace on the country road magnificently. The riding pleasure and suitability for everyday use are high, the now installed riding aids offer a plus in safety. Your opponents will have a really hard time from now on.

Light and natural handling with high stability

Silky engine with full pull from mid revs

High chassis transparency, great feedback

Sitting position with feel-good factor

Fair price

TFT display mounted too low

Cumbersome menu operation

Rear view mirrors offer modest visibility

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020

The Street Triple R is well equipped for the occasional track day and delivers good performance. This is where the lively three-cylinder engine really comes into its own. But the agile Triumph is also great fun on country roads, as long as you keep it revved up. All in all, the clear price-performance winner of the Street Triple range.

Wide usable rev range

active seating position

high stability

great gearbox with shift assistant

first-class chassis.

Traction control regulates early

seat with little grip

display outdated

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z900 vs Triumph Street Triple 765 R

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z900 2019 and a Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 40. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Street Triple 765 R with 69 days compared to 116 days for the Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 and 15 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 765 R since model year 2017. The first review for the Kawasaki Z900 was published on 11/11/2016 and now has more than 93,200 views. This compares to more than 58,400 views for the first review on Triumph Street Triple 765 R published on 10/01/2017.

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Street Triple 765 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG