BMW S 1000 R 2022 vs. Yamaha MT-10 SP 2023

BMW S 1000 R 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2022

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2023

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2023

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2022 vs Yamaha MT-10 SP 2023

The BMW S 1000 R 2022 and the Yamaha MT-10 SP 2023 are both powerful naked bikes with similar engine types, engine power, torque, fuel systems, cylinders, and cooling systems. The BMW S 1000 R has a slightly higher engine power of 165 HP compared to the Yamaha MT-10 SP's 166 HP. However, the Yamaha MT-10 SP has a slightly higher torque of 112 Nm compared to the BMW S 1000 R's 114 Nm. Both bikes have a displacement of around 1000 cc.

In terms of suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspensions with monoshocks at the rear. The suspension of both bikes can be adjusted for compression, preload, and rebound. The chassis of both bikes is made of aluminum, providing strength and stability. However, the BMW S 1000 R has a twin-tube frame, while the Yamaha MT-10 SP has a Deltabox frame.

BMW S 1000 R 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2022

Both bikes have double disk brakes at the front with a diameter of 320 mm and four pistons. The brakes of both bikes use radial technology, providing excellent stopping power. Additionally, both bikes are equipped with advanced rider assistance systems such as ABS, riding modes, cornering ABS, ride by wire, traction control, and anti-wheelie. The BMW S 1000 R also has hill start assist and a quickshifter, while the Yamaha MT-10 SP has suspension that is electronically adjustable, a shift assistant with blipper, cruise control, and anti-wheelie.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters. The BMW S 1000 R has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1450 mm compared to the Yamaha MT-10 SP's 1405 mm. The seat height of the Yamaha MT-10 SP is slightly higher at 835 mm compared to the BMW S 1000 R's 830 mm. However, the Yamaha MT-10 SP is heavier with a kerb weight of 214 kg compared to the BMW S 1000 R's 199 kg. Both bikes have fuel tank capacities of around 16-17 liters, providing a range of approximately 248-266 km. The combined fuel consumption of the Yamaha MT-10 SP is slightly higher at 6.83 l/100km compared to the BMW S 1000 R's 6.2 l/100km.

In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 R 2022 is praised for its powerful engine, strong brakes, comfortable ergonomics, good standard equipment, and extensive range of accessories. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-10 SP 2023 is praised for its great ride comfort, balance between sportiness and practicality, fantastic engine response, sensitive and practical chassis, high-quality frame including a magnificent swingarm, wonderfully relaxed seating position, cool sound, and being a true naked bike.

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2023

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2023

However, the BMW S 1000 R 2022 has some weaknesses, including a sluggish shift assistant and optics that are not 100% coherent. The Yamaha MT-10 SP 2023 also has some weaknesses, including feeling too comfortable on a racetrack excursion due to the inactive and comfortable seating position, a slightly lumpy front appearance, and brakes that seem undersized for such a top model.

Overall, both the BMW S 1000 R 2022 and the Yamaha MT-10 SP 2023 are powerful and capable naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two would depend on individual preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2022 compared to Yamaha MT-10 SP 2023

BMW S 1000 R 2022
Yamaha MT-10 SP 2023
Show all
Same only
Differences
BMW S 1000 R 2022
BMW S 1000 R 2022
Yamaha MT-10 SP 2023
Yamaha MT-10 SP 2023

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke50.9 mm
Engine powerEngine power165 HPEngine power166 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,500 rpm
TorqueTorque114 NmTorque112 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque9,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.5 Compression Ratio12
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHC, Drag leverValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement998 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter45 mmDiameter43 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel120 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel117 mmTravel120 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeDeltabox
RakeRake65.8 degreeRake66 degree
TrailTrail96 mmTrail102 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter320 mmDiameter320 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFloating caliper
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter220 mmDiameter220 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Hill start assist, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Quickshifter, Traction control, Anti-wheelieAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Suspension electronically adjustable, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Shift assistant with blipper, Cruise control, Traction control, Anti-wheelie

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,090 mmLength2,100 mm
WidthWidth812 mmWidth800 mm
HeightHeight1,115 mmHeight1,165 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,405 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height830 mmSeat Height835 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)199 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)214 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA
RangeRange266 kmRange248 km
Combined CO2 emissionsCombined CO2 emissions144 g/kmCombined CO2 emissions159 g/km
Combined fuel consumptionCombined fuel consumption6.2 l/100kmCombined fuel consumption6.83 l/100km

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2022

The seating position is sporty, but by no means uncomfortable, the brakes are powerful and the engine of the S 1000 R is at its best - perhaps even a little too homogeneous. There is also nothing to complain about on the riding side. Based on the pure performance data and the installed electronic features, the BMW probably has what it takes for the fastest lap time. And that on any kind of surface, because with the semi-active suspension you can eat up kilometre after kilometre on bad roads littered with potholes. Unfortunately, this feeling of superiority never really spilled over to the driver. Probably the downside of too much balance in all areas - at least in my Italophile eyes. The BMW lacked that certain something, the charisma, which is difficult to explain but arouses genuine emotions.

powerful engine

strong brakes

comfortable ergonomics

good standard equipment

extensive range of accessories

Sluggish shift assistant

optics not 100% coherent

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2023

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2023

The MT-10SP is a beautifully made naked bike. It has placed the exact right ingredients in the right places. It rides comfortably and gets really fast when needed. Basically, it is designed as a country road bike, but is still fun on individual trackdays.

Really great ride comfort

Great balance between sportiness, practicality and ride comfort

Fantastic engine response

Sensitive and practical chassis

High-quality frame including magnificent swingarm

Wonderfully relaxed seating position

Cool but not annoying sound

A real nakedbike

On a racetrack excursion, the bike seems a little too comfortable in the end - this is due to the inactive and comfortable seating position

the front looks a little lumpy

the brakes are good, but still seem undersized on such a top model - there's more to be done.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs Yamaha MT-10 SP

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2022 and a Yamaha MT-10 SP 2023. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha MT-10 SP 2023 is about 3% higher. Compared to Yamaha MT-10 SP 2023 there are less BMW S 1000 R 2022 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 22 compared to 23. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 71 days compared to 72 days for a Yamaha MT-10 SP. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 18 reviews for the Yamaha MT-10 SP since model year 2017. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 03/11/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 28,600 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-10 SP published on 04/10/2016.

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-10 SP

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen