Husaberg FE 501 2013 vs. SWM SM 500 R 2022

Husaberg FE 501 2013

Husaberg FE 501 2013

SWM SM 500 R 2022

SWM SM 500 R 2022

Loading...

Overview - Husaberg FE 501 2013 vs SWM SM 500 R 2022

Husaberg FE 501 2013

Husaberg FE 501 2013

SWM SM 500 R 2022

SWM SM 500 R 2022

Technical Specifications Husaberg FE 501 2013 compared to SWM SM 500 R 2022

Husaberg FE 501 2013
SWM SM 500 R 2022

Engine and Drive Train

CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement510.4 ccmDisplacement501 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandWPBrandKayaba

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandWPBrandKayaba

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
Seat HeightSeat Height970 mmSeat Height920 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight112 kgDry Weight120 kg

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husaberg FE 501 vs SWM SM 500 R

Price Husaberg FE 501

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price SWM SM 500 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH