KTM 690 Enduro R 2011 vs. Husqvarna FE 350 2017

Technical Specifications KTM 690 Enduro R 2011 compared to Husqvarna FE 350 2017

KTM 690 Enduro R 2011

Husqvarna FE 350 2017

Show all

Same only

Differences

KTM 690 Enduro R 2011

Husqvarna FE 350 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	102 mm	Bore	88 mm
Stroke	Stroke	80 mm	Stroke	57.5 mm
Compression Ratio	Compression Ratio	11.8	Compression Ratio	12.3
Starter	Starter	Electric	Starter	Electric
Clutch Type	Clutch Type	Antihopping	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath
Transmission	Transmission	Chain	Transmission	Chain
Cylinders	Cylinders	1	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	4-Stroke	Strokes	4-Stroke
Displacement	Displacement	654 ccm	Displacement	349.7 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspension	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork
Brand	Brand	WP	Brand	WP

Suspension Rear

Shock mount	Shock mount	Deflection	Shock mount	direct
Brand	Brand	WP	Brand	WP

Chassis

Frame	Frame	Chromium-molybdenum	Frame	Steel
Frame type	Frame type	Tubular	Frame type	Central tube

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre width	Front tyre width	90 mm	Front tyre width	90 mm
Front tyre height	Front tyre height	90 %	Front tyre height	90 %
Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	21 inch	Front tyre diameter	21 inch
Rear tyre width	Rear tyre width	140 mm	Rear tyre width	140 mm
Rear tyre height	Rear tyre height	80 %	Rear tyre height	80 %
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,498 mm	Wheelbase	1,495 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	930 mm	Seat Height	970 mm
Dry Weight	Dry Weight	138.5 kg	Dry Weight	106.8 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	12 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	8.5 l