Honda XL750 Transalp 2023 vs. Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017

Honda XL750 Transalp 2023

Honda XL750 Transalp 2023

Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017

Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017

Loading...

Overview - Honda XL750 Transalp 2023 vs Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017

The Honda XL750 Transalp 2023 and the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017 are both enduro motorcycles with similar engine types, bore, stroke, starter, transmission, cylinders, and displacement. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Honda XL750 Transalp 2023 has 92 HP, while the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017 has 95 HP. The Transalp has a torque of 75 Nm, while the Africa Twin has a torque of 98 Nm. This means that the Africa Twin has slightly more power and torque, which can result in better acceleration and performance.

Both motorcycles have upside-down telescopic forks for the front suspension, but the Africa Twin has additional adjustments for compression, preload, and rebound. This allows for more customization and fine-tuning of the suspension settings, making it more suitable for different riding conditions.

In terms of chassis, both motorcycles have a steel frame, which provides strength and durability. The XL750 Transalp has a weight of 208 kg, while the Africa Twin weighs 232 kg. This means that the Transalp is lighter and may offer better maneuverability and agility.

Honda XL750 Transalp 2023

Honda XL750 Transalp 2023

Both motorcycles have double disk brakes at the front, with Nissin as the brand. This ensures reliable and efficient braking performance.

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, both motorcycles have ABS and traction control. However, the XL750 Transalp also has riding modes and ride by wire, which can enhance the riding experience and provide more control.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both motorcycles have a front tire diameter of 21 inches and a rear tire width of 150 mm. The Transalp has a rear tire diameter of 18 inches, while the Africa Twin has a slightly larger rear tire diameter of 18 inches. The wheelbase of the Transalp is 1560 mm, while the Africa Twin has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1575 mm. Both motorcycles have a seat height of 850 mm, which can provide a comfortable riding position for most riders. The Transalp has a fuel tank capacity of 16.9 l, while the Africa Twin has a larger fuel tank capacity of 18.8 l.

In terms of strengths, the XL750 Transalp is praised for its accessible and fun engine, making it suitable for both small and big riders. It also offers good workmanship, value for money, low weight, easy handling, and low fuel consumption.

Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017

Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017

On the other hand, the Africa Twin is praised for its comfortable and well-dimensioned engine. It also has a slightly lower seat height, which can be advantageous for riders with a height of 175 cm or more.

In terms of weaknesses, the Transalp lacks cruise control and its components may reach their limits under tougher conditions. It also has relatively little lean angle clearance and carefully tuned electronics.

The Africa Twin has suspension elements that are too comfortably tuned at high speeds and its traction control can be annoying off-road as it needs to be readjusted after every short break.

In conclusion, both the Honda XL750 Transalp 2023 and the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Transalp offers a more accessible and lightweight option with good value for money, while the Africa Twin provides a more comfortable and powerful option with additional suspension adjustments. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and intended use.

Technical Specifications Honda XL750 Transalp 2023 compared to Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017

Honda XL750 Transalp 2023
Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore87 mmBore92 mm
StrokeStroke63.5 mmStroke75.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power92 HPEngine power95 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power7,500 rpm
TorqueTorque75 NmTorque98 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,250 rpmRpm at Torque6,000 rpm
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeAntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement755 ccmDisplacement998 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandShowaBrandShowa
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreloadAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
Shock mountShock mountPro-LinkShock mountPro-Link
BrandBrandShowaBrandShowa
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreloadAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound
MaterialMaterialAluminiumMaterialAluminium

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter310 mmDiameter310 mm
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyWaveTechnologyradial
BrandBrandNissinBrandNissin

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter256 mmDiameter256 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width150 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height70 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
LengthLength2,325 mmLength2,335 mm
WidthWidth838 mmWidth875 mm
HeightHeight1,450 mmHeight1,475 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,560 mmWheelbase1,575 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height850 mmSeat Height850 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)208 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)232 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16.9 lFuel Tank Capacity18.8 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Honda XL750 Transalp 2023

Honda XL750 Transalp 2023

The Transalp had to prove itself in several tests at 1000PS in 2023. Surprisingly, it scored particularly well in the pillion test on Tenerife. Its accessible nature makes motorcycling easy. You can enjoy the ride and the landscape. The machine offers a surprising amount of sportiness with a very accessible character. All in all, the Transalp is a great all-rounder.

Sporty engine that is also very accessible Wonderfully easy-to-operate engine with butter-smooth clutch

Engine feels very revvy

Precise transmission

great comfort and plenty of space for pillion

Sporty engine - yet low fuel consumption

Switches and dashboard are generally robust

Economical engine

good price/performance ratio

great stability

strong practicality

Driver assistance systems have to manage without IMU - therefore very defensive control

Suspension offers too little adjustment range

no cruise control available

Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017

Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017

Still sensational. It scores with the familiar Honda virtues, but never gets stale. A motorbike that goes with you through thick and thin and doesn't tire even on extra-long tours. Very robust off-road, also copes with really tough passages without any problems. Still the benchmark for touring enduros in 2017.

Comfortable but not boring

Pleasant and perfectly dimensioned engine

Seat height a tad lower than on the KTM- from 175cm height it could work

Suspension elements do everything off-road, but are too comfortably tuned at high speeds

traction control is annoying off-road - always has to be readjusted after every short break.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Honda XL750 Transalp vs Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin

There are a few key differences between a Honda XL750 Transalp 2023 and a Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017 is about 10% higher. Compared to Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017 there are more Honda XL750 Transalp 2023 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 171 compared to 13. It takes less time to sell a Honda XL750 Transalp with 60 days compared to 91 days for a Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin. Since model year 2023 1000PS.de editors have written 15 reviews for the Honda XL750 Transalp and 47 reviews for the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin since model year 2015. The first review for the Honda XL750 Transalp was published on 08/09/2022 and now has more than 57,900 views. This compares to more than 13,600 views for the first review on Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin published on 12/05/2015.

Price Honda XL750 Transalp

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG