Husqvarna TE 125 2016 vs. Beta Evo 125 2T 2017

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Beta Evo 125 2T 2017

Overview - Husqvarna TE 125 2016 vs Beta Evo 125 2T 2017

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Beta Evo 125 2T 2017

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 125 2016 compared to Beta Evo 125 2T 2017

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Beta Evo 125 2T 2017

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Beta Evo 125 2T 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	54 mm	Bore	54 mm
Stroke	Stroke	54.5 mm	Stroke	54 mm
Clutch Type	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath
Transmission	Transmission	Chain	Transmission	Chain
Cylinders	Cylinders	1	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	2-Stroke	Strokes	2-Stroke
Displacement	Displacement	124.8 ccm	Displacement	124 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspension	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork	Front suspension	Telescopic fork

Chassis

Frame	Frame	Steel	Frame	Aluminium
Frame type	Frame type	Central tube	Frame type	Twin Tube

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre width	Front tyre width	90 mm	Front tyre width	80 mm
Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	21 inch	Front tyre diameter	21 inch
Rear tyre width	Rear tyre width	120 mm	Rear tyre width	110 mm
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,471 mm	Wheelbase	1,305 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	960 mm	Seat Height	660 mm
Dry Weight	Dry Weight	96 kg	Dry Weight	67.5 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	11 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	2.6 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

The beginner enduro for riders who want to do everything right from the start. Does not forgive shifting errors and always wants to be ridden in the right rev range. In 2017, the 125 was made even lighter - dry, the 125 weighs just 92 kg.

cheapest model

easy handling

best learning effect

Less forgiving of mistakes

limited engine power