Kawasaki Z900 2018 vs. Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018

Kawasaki Z900 2018

Kawasaki Z900 2018

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z900 2018 vs Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018

The Kawasaki Z900 2018 and the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018 are both powerful naked bikes with inline engines and similar technical specifications. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018 has a slight advantage with 149 HP compared to the Kawasaki Z900 2018's 125.4 HP. The Suzuki also has a higher torque of 106 Nm compared to the Kawasaki's 98.6 Nm. This means that the Suzuki may offer slightly better acceleration and overall performance.

Both bikes have fuel injection systems and liquid cooling, ensuring efficient and reliable operation. They also have four cylinders and similar displacements, with the Kawasaki at 948 ccm and the Suzuki at 999 ccm.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspension with a monoshock at the rear. The Kawasaki offers adjustment options for preload and rebound on both the front and rear suspension, while the Suzuki has additional compression adjustment for the front suspension. This may provide the Suzuki with more precise tuning options for different riding conditions.

Kawasaki Z900 2018

Kawasaki Z900 2018

The chassis of the Kawasaki Z900 2018 is made of steel and has a double cradle frame, while the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018 has an aluminum frame with a twin tube design. The choice of materials and frame design may affect the overall weight and handling characteristics of the bikes.

Both bikes are equipped with double disk brakes at the front, with the Suzuki having slightly larger diameter disks at 310 mm compared to the Kawasaki's 300 mm. Both bikes also have four-piston calipers and ABS for advanced rider assistance.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018 has a slightly longer wheelbase at 1460 mm compared to the Kawasaki Z900 2018's 1450 mm. The Suzuki also has a slightly higher seat height at 815 mm compared to the Kawasaki's 795 mm. However, the overall kerb weight with ABS is slightly lighter for the Suzuki at 209 kg compared to the Kawasaki's 210 kg.

Now, let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each bike. The Kawasaki Z900 2018 is praised for its powerful and smooth engine, providing a great sound experience. Its chassis offers a sharp and sporty look, and the low seating position contributes to easy handling and manoeuvrability.

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018

On the other hand, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018 is known for its stable handling, inspiring confidence in the rider. The engine is also highly regarded for its sporty performance and the bike has a sexy look and sound. Additionally, the Suzuki provides pleasant riding comfort in the saddle and can ride dynamically or calmly, depending on the rider's preference.

However, the Kawasaki Z900 2018 has a couple of weaknesses. It lacks traction control, which may be a disadvantage in certain riding conditions. Additionally, tall riders may find the knee angle strenuous during long rides.

Similarly, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018 has a minor weakness in that it can be a little jerky when changing from push to load. Some riders also feel that a quickshifter with blipper would greatly enhance the bike's performance.

In conclusion, both the Kawasaki Z900 2018 and the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018 are powerful and stylish naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two ultimately depends on the rider's preferences and priorities, whether it be engine power, handling, comfort, or specific features.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z900 2018 compared to Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018

Kawasaki Z900 2018
Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018
Show all
Same only
Differences
Kawasaki Z900 2018
Kawasaki Z900 2018
Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018
Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore73.4 mm
StrokeStroke56 mmStroke59 mm
Engine powerEngine power125.4 HPEngine power149 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque98.6 NmTorque106 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,700 rpmRpm at Torque9,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.8 Compression Ratio12.2
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Throttle BoreThrottle Bore36 mmThrottle Bore44 mm
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement948 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter43 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel120 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountDeflection
TravelTravel140 mmTravel130 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentPreload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter300 mmDiameter310 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter250 mmDiameter250 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height50 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,070 mmLength2,115 mm
WidthWidth820 mmWidth795 mm
HeightHeight1,065 mmHeight1,080 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,460 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height795 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)210 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)209 kg
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z900 2018

Kawasaki Z900 2018

In the hotly contested naked bike segment, the Z900 plays right at the front. Above all, its engine is absolutely terrific, runs incredibly silky and offers rich power in all rev regions - as befits a Japanese four-cylinder. Its sporty, aggressive appearance matches this. It does without electronic bells and whistles, but still conveys a lot of confidence when chasing corners, braking and accelerating out of them. The low seat is especially beneficial for smaller riders, but taller riders might miss a flatter knee angle on long distances. The low weight and compactness make the Z900 particularly agile and easy to handle. A sporting cannon that is also extremely appealing in terms of price

Powerful and silky engine

great sound

chassis

sharp, sporty look

low seating position

easy handling and manoeuvrability.

Lack of traction control

Knee angle strenuous for tall riders in the long run

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018

The GSX-S 1000 from Suzuki looks sexy, has a powerful sound and really smart hardware. It rides stably, easily and is also fun to ride on tours. If necessary, the engine smokes up violently. But it can also be moved mildly. Compared to the finest Powernakeds, it lacks individual features, but anyone who looks at the price tag will quickly realise: A great choice!

Stable handling inspires confidence

Wonderfully sporty engine

Sexy look and sexy sound

Pleasant riding comfort in the saddle

Rides dynamically but also calmly and serenely - just the way you like it.

A little jerky when changing from push to load

a quickshifter with blipper would be incredibly good for it.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z900 vs Suzuki GSX-S1000

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z900 2018 and a Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018 is about 9% higher. A Kawasaki Z900 2018 experiences a loss of 650 GBP in one year and 530 GBP in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 270 GBP and 1,020 GBP for a Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018. Compared to Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018 there are more Kawasaki Z900 2018 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 55 compared to 9. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki Z900 with 112 days compared to 177 days for a Suzuki GSX-S1000. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 and 36 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 since model year 2015. The first review for the Kawasaki Z900 was published on 11/11/2016 and now has more than 93,200 views. This compares to more than 17,100 views for the first review on Suzuki GSX-S1000 published on 27/09/2014.

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Suzuki GSX-S1000

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen