Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 vs. Honda CBR650R 2021

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

Honda CBR650R 2021

Honda CBR650R 2021

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 vs Honda CBR650R 2021

When comparing the Kawasaki Ninja 650 model year 2017 and the Honda CBR650R model year 2021, there are several notable differences and similarities to consider.

Starting with the engine and drive train, both motorcycles have an inline engine configuration with four valves per cylinder and DOHC technology. However, there are differences in bore, stroke, engine power, torque, and compression ratio. The Ninja 650 has a larger bore of 83mm compared to the CBR650R's 67mm, resulting in a higher engine power of 68.2 HP for the Ninja 650 compared to the CBR650R's 95 HP. The torque is also slightly higher for the Ninja 650 at 65.7 Nm compared to the CBR650R's 63 Nm. Additionally, the Ninja 650 has a lower compression ratio of 10.8 compared to the CBR650R's 11.6. Both motorcycles have a displacement of 649cc.

Moving on to the suspension, both motorcycles have a swing arm rear suspension with a monoshock absorber and preload adjustment. However, the Ninja 650 has a telescopic fork front suspension with a diameter of 41mm, while the CBR650R has an upside-down telescopic fork front suspension with the same diameter.

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

In terms of the chassis, both motorcycles have a steel frame. However, the Ninja 650 has a tubular frame type, while the CBR650R has a twin tube frame type. The rake and trail measurements also differ slightly, with the Ninja 650 having a rake of 65.5 degrees and a trail of 100mm, and the CBR650R having a rake of 64.5 degrees and a trail of 101mm.

When it comes to the brakes, both motorcycles have double disk front brakes. However, the CBR650R has a larger front brake diameter of 310mm compared to the Ninja 650's 300mm. The CBR650R also features radial technology for its front brakes, which may provide improved braking performance.

Both motorcycles are equipped with ABS as part of their advanced rider assistance systems.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both motorcycles have the same front tire width of 120mm and diameter of 17 inches. However, the CBR650R has a wider rear tire width of 180mm compared to the Ninja 650's 160mm. Both motorcycles have the same rear tire diameter of 17 inches. The CBR650R also has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1450mm compared to the Ninja 650's 1410mm. The seat height is higher for the CBR650R at 810mm compared to the Ninja 650's 790mm. The CBR650R also has a higher kerb weight with ABS at 208kg compared to the Ninja 650's 193kg. Both motorcycles have a fuel tank capacity of around 15 liters.

Honda CBR650R 2021

Honda CBR650R 2021

In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 is praised for its transparent chassis for sport, playful and good-natured handling, excellent brakes, sharp looks reminiscent of the ZX-10R, and a resilient engine. On the other hand, the Honda CBR650R 2021 is praised for its resilient four-cylinder engine, comfortable seating position, improved chassis for 2021, cool look, and ease of operation.

However, the Ninja 650 2017 is noted to have little sound from the stock exhaust and slight vibrations from the engine. The CBR650R 2021 is mentioned to have a sluggish engine below 8,000 revolutions and an outdated-looking LCD display.

In conclusion, while both motorcycles have their strengths and weaknesses, the choice between the Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 and the Honda CBR650R 2021 ultimately depends on personal preferences and priorities, such as desired performance, comfort, and aesthetics.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 compared to Honda CBR650R 2021

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017
Honda CBR650R 2021

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore83 mmBore67 mm
StrokeStroke60 mmStroke46 mm
Engine powerEngine power68.2 HPEngine power95 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power12,000 rpm
TorqueTorque65.7 NmTorque63 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,000 rpmRpm at Torque8,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10.8 Compression Ratio11.6
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionDigitalIgnitionDigital, Transistor
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement649 ccmDisplacement649 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel125 mmTravel120 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreloadAdjustmentPreload

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTwin Tube
RakeRake65.5 degreeRake64.5 degree
TrailTrail100 mmTrail101 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter300 mmDiameter310 mm
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter220 mmDiameter240 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,055 mmLength2,120 mm
WidthWidth740 mmWidth750 mm
HeightHeight1,135 mmHeight1,150 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height790 mmSeat Height810 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)193 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)208 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15 lFuel Tank Capacity15.4 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

The Ninja 650 firmly stamps its predecessor (Er-6f). The engine has mastered the Euro 4 hurdle well and serves up a very usable 68 hp, the chassis is simply great for this class, and the weight reduction of 18(!) kilos compared to the ER-6f justifies reverent nods.

Transparent chassis for sport

playful and good-natured handling, excellent brakes, sharp looks a la ZX-10R

resilient engine.

Little sound from the series pot

engine shows slight vibrations

Honda CBR650R 2021

Honda CBR650R 2021

The 2021 update of the Honda CBR650R solves the biggest problem of the previous year's model: the overly comfortable chassis. The new Showa fork gives the sports bike a much sportier response, which is immediately noticeable on winding country roads. However, one should not expect a thoroughbred super sports bike, but a road sports bike suitable for everyday use, on which one can experience a lot of pleasure in the saddle both on the way to work and on a weekend ride.

Resilient four-cylinder

comfortable seating position

improved chassis for 2021

cool look

easy to operate.

Engine sluggish below 8,000 revolutions

LC display now looks old-fashioned

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Ninja 650 vs Honda CBR650R

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 and a Honda CBR650R 2021. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 7. It takes less time to sell a Honda CBR650R with 81 days compared to 96 days for the Kawasaki Ninja 650. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 20 reviews for the Kawasaki Ninja 650 and 14 reviews for the Honda CBR650R since model year 2019. The first review for the Kawasaki Ninja 650 was published on 04/10/2016 and now has more than 79,600 views. This compares to more than 53,700 views for the first review on Honda CBR650R published on 08/10/2018.

Price Kawasaki Ninja 650

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Honda CBR650R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG