Kawasaki KLX 250 2009 vs. Beta RR 400 4T 2014

Kawasaki KLX 250 2009

Kawasaki KLX 250 2009

Beta RR 400 4T 2014

Beta RR 400 4T 2014

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki KLX 250 2009 vs Beta RR 400 4T 2014

Kawasaki KLX 250 2009

Kawasaki KLX 250 2009

Beta RR 400 4T 2014

Beta RR 400 4T 2014

Technical Specifications Kawasaki KLX 250 2009 compared to Beta RR 400 4T 2014

Kawasaki KLX 250 2009
Beta RR 400 4T 2014

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore72 mmBore95 mm
StrokeStroke61.2 mmStroke56.2 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11 Compression Ratio12.4
IgnitionIgnitionDigitalIgnitionCDI, Kokusan
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement249 ccmDisplacement398 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typePerimeterFrame typeDouble cradle

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
Seat HeightSeat Height890 mmSeat Height940 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight138 kgDry Weight113 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.7 lFuel Tank Capacity8 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki KLX 250 2009

Kawasaki KLX 250 2009

On the typical motorbike routes, you become a moving obstacle on long uphill stretches. If you don't have anything to prove to anyone, you'll reach your destination a little later; the rest of us should go for more engine capacity.

Pleasant driving experience

really good off-road characteristics

quite stable and precise.

Climbing obstacles without momentum is not possible.

Beta RR 400 4T 2014

Beta RR 400 4T 2014

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH