Triumph Thruxton RS 2020 vs. Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016

Triumph Thruxton RS 2020

Triumph Thruxton RS 2020

Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016

Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Thruxton RS 2020 vs Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016

The Triumph Thruxton RS 2020 and the Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. They both have an in-line crankpin offset engine with a displacement of 1200cc. They also have the same torque of 112 Nm and use a fuel injection system. Both bikes have a liquid cooling system and are equipped with ABS as an advanced rider assistance system.

In terms of engine power, the Thruxton RS 2020 has an advantage with 105 HP compared to the Thruxton 1200 2016, which has 97 HP. This makes the RS model more powerful and provides better acceleration and top speed.

The suspension systems on both bikes are similar, with a telescopic fork at the front and a swing arm with dual shocks at the rear. However, the Thruxton RS 2020 has a higher-quality front suspension from Showa and a rear suspension from Öhlins, which offers more adjustability in terms of compression, preload, and rebound. The Thruxton 1200 2016, on the other hand, has front and rear suspension from Kayaba, with only preload adjustment available at the rear.

Triumph Thruxton RS 2020

Triumph Thruxton RS 2020

Both bikes have a steel frame with a central tube design, providing good stability and handling. The braking systems on both bikes consist of double discs at the front with a diameter of 310 mm. However, the Thruxton RS 2020 has four-piston Brembo calipers, while the Thruxton 1200 2016 has double-piston Nissin calipers. This gives the RS model better braking performance and more control.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters. They also have the same wheelbase of 1415 mm. However, the seat height of the Thruxton RS 2020 is slightly higher at 810 mm compared to 805 mm for the Thruxton 1200 2016. The dry weight of the Thruxton RS 2020 is also lower at 197 kg compared to 206 kg for the Thruxton 1200 2016. Both bikes have a fuel tank capacity of 14.5 liters.

Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016

Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016

In terms of strengths, the Thruxton RS 2020 stands out for its attention to detail with many wonderful details, powerful engine, very high-quality brakes, good chassis, great engine response, and overall easy handling and control. On the other hand, the Thruxton 1200 2016 is praised for its powerful and finely tuned engine, authentic look, and genuine classic bike feel.

However, the Thruxton RS 2020 has some weaknesses, including being only available as the top RS version and having inadequate splash protection in bad weather. The Thruxton 1200 2016, on the other hand, has a chassis that is clearly below that of the "R" version, moderate comfort, and good sound.

Overall, the Triumph Thruxton RS 2020 offers more advanced features, better performance, and improved handling compared to the Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016. However, the Thruxton 1200 2016 has its own charm with its authentic classic bike feel and powerful engine.

Technical Specifications Triumph Thruxton RS 2020 compared to Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016

Triumph Thruxton RS 2020
Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn line crankpin offsetEngine typeIn line crankpin offset
BoreBore97.6 mmBore97.6 mm
StrokeStroke80 mmStroke80 mm
Engine powerEngine power105 HPEngine power97 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power6,750 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque112 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque4,250 rpmRpm at Torque4,950 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.066 Compression Ratio11
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesOHCValvesOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,200 ccmDisplacement1,200 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork
BrandBrandShowaBrandKayaba
DiameterDiameter43 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel120 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberDual ShockShock absorberDual Shock
BrandBrandÖhlinsBrandKayaba
TravelTravel120 mmTravel120 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentPreload
MaterialMaterialSteelMaterialSteel

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeCentral tubeFrame typeCentral tube
RakeRake67.2 degreeRake67.3 degree
TrailTrail92 mmTrail90.8 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter310 mmDiameter310 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper
BrandBrandBremboBrandNissin

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter220 mmDiameter255 mm
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper
BrandBrandNissinBrandNissin

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width160 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,105 mmLength2,105 mm
WidthWidth745 mmWidth745 mm
HeightHeight1,030 mmHeight1,030 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,415 mmWheelbase1,415 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height810 mmSeat Height805 mm
Dry Weight (with ABS)Dry Weight (with ABS)197 kgDry Weight (with ABS)206 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14.5 lFuel Tank Capacity14.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Thruxton RS 2020

Triumph Thruxton RS 2020

The sporty machine has been improved in all relevant areas. The engine, which looks like a rustic machine, revs up lively and is easy to control. The technology is discreetly hidden in the beautiful motorbike. Overall, the machine presents itself as desirable and casual.

Attention to detail with many wonderful details

powerful engine

very high quality brakes

good chassis

great engine response

entire motorbike easy to handle and control.

Only available as top version RS

splash protection in bad weather inadequate

Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016

Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016

The Thruxton is far behind the Öhlins and Showa-equipped "R" in terms of sporty performance. This becomes particularly clear on the Alpine passes, where a good chassis, strong brakes and light handling are crucial. In return, it rewards the eye of the aesthete with an even more authentic, because more classic, exterior. Laymen can hardly distinguish a new Thruxton from a vintage or youngtimer. Like the Street Twin, it has a sympathetic effect on passers-by and should be enjoyed in a relaxed manner.

Powerful, finely tuned engine

authentic look

genuine classic bike

Chassis clearly below that of the "R"

moderate comfort

good sound

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Thruxton RS vs Triumph Thruxton 1200

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Thruxton RS 2020 and a Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Thruxton 1200 with 79 days compared to 159 days for the Triumph Thruxton RS. Since model year 2020 1000PS.de editors have written 8 reviews for the Triumph Thruxton RS and 5 reviews for the Triumph Thruxton 1200 since model year 2016. The first review for the Triumph Thruxton RS was published on 05/11/2019 and now has more than 29,300 views. This compares to more than 38,500 views for the first review on Triumph Thruxton 1200 published on 09/03/2016.

Price Triumph Thruxton RS

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Thruxton 1200

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons