Triumph Speed Triple R 2016 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2014

When comparing the Triumph Speed Triple R 2016 and the BMW S 1000 R 2014, it is important to consider their technical specifications and strengths and weaknesses.

In terms of engine and drive train, both bikes have in-line engines, but the Triumph Speed Triple R has a three-cylinder engine with 140 HP and 112 Nm of torque, while the BMW S 1000 R has a four-cylinder engine with 160 HP and the same torque. The Triumph has a displacement of 1050 ccm, while the BMW has a slightly smaller displacement of 999 ccm.

Both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks for the front suspension and monoshock absorbers for the rear suspension. However, the Triumph has a single swing arm for the rear suspension, while the BMW has a swing arm. The Triumph also has Öhlins suspension components, which are known for their excellent performance.

Triumph Speed Triple R 2016

In terms of brakes, both bikes have double disk brakes with four pistons at the front. The Triumph's brakes are radial and monoblock, while the BMW's brakes are radial. Both bikes also have advanced rider assistance systems, including ABS and traction control for the Triumph, and dynamic suspension for the BMW.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters. The Triumph has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1435 mm compared to the BMW's 1439 mm. The seat height of the Triumph is 825 mm, while the BMW's seat height is slightly lower at 814 mm. The Triumph also has a slightly higher kerb weight of 212 kg compared to the BMW's 207 kg. The BMW also has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17.5 l compared to the Triumph's 15.5 l.

BMW S 1000 R 2014

When it comes to strengths, the Triumph Speed Triple R has a powerful and unique three-cylinder engine, brute brakes, well-functioning electronic features, excellent Öhlins suspension components, and a traditional look. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R has a sporty chassis, extreme power and performance, very good electronic helpers, a terrific price/performance ratio, and is fast and comfortable on the racetrack and country roads.

However, both bikes also have their weaknesses. The Triumph Speed Triple R has somewhat sluggish handling and a high surcharge for the R version. The BMW S 1000 R has a slightly rough engine running, dynamic suspension that is rather on the "hard" side overall, a relatively high seat, and a design that is a matter of taste.

In conclusion, the Triumph Speed Triple R 2016 and the BMW S 1000 R 2014 are both powerful naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Triumph offers a unique three-cylinder engine and excellent suspension components, while the BMW provides extreme power and performance at a good price/performance ratio. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.