Yamaha XSR700 2017 vs. Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2019

Yamaha XSR700 2017

Yamaha XSR700 2017

Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2019

Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2019

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha XSR700 2017 vs Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2019

The Yamaha XSR700 2017 and the Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2019 are both naked bikes with similar engine power of 75 HP. However, the Yamaha XSR700 has a torque of 68 Nm, while the Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 has a torque of 72 Nm. Both bikes have fuel injection systems and liquid cooling.

In terms of engine configuration, the Yamaha XSR700 has a 2-cylinder engine with a displacement of 689 ccm, while the Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 has a single-cylinder engine with a displacement of 693 ccm. This difference in engine configuration may result in different riding characteristics and power delivery.

Both bikes have front telescopic fork suspensions and swing arm rear suspensions. However, the Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 has an upside-down telescopic fork front suspension, which may provide better performance and handling compared to the Yamaha XSR700's telescopic fork suspension. The chassis of the Yamaha XSR700 is made of steel, while the Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 has a chromium-molybdenum frame. The use of chromium-molybdenum may result in a lighter and more rigid chassis for the Husqvarna Vitpilen 701.

Yamaha XSR700 2017

Yamaha XSR700 2017

In terms of braking, the Yamaha XSR700 has double disk brakes with a diameter of 282 mm and four pistons, while the Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 has a single disk brake with a diameter of 320 mm and four pistons. The larger diameter of the Husqvarna Vitpilen 701's brake may provide better stopping power.

Both bikes are equipped with ABS as an advanced rider assistance system. The Yamaha XSR700 has a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 180 mm, while the Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 has a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 160 mm. The Yamaha XSR700 has a wheelbase of 1405 mm and a seat height of 815 mm, while the Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 has a wheelbase of 1434 mm and a seat height of 830 mm. The Yamaha XSR700 has a kerb weight (with ABS) of 186 kg and a fuel tank capacity of 14 l, while the Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 has a kerb weight (with ABS) of 157 kg and a fuel tank capacity of 12 l.

Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2019

Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2019

In terms of strengths, the Yamaha XSR700 2017 is praised for its wonderful engine, solid workmanship, cool retro look, large range of original accessories, great automatic gearshift, sporty and tight chassis, easy to drive, and being a joy dispenser for riders of all ages. On the other hand, the Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2019 is praised for its fantastic design, powerful engine, quickshifter with blipper function, high-quality chassis, sporty seating position, and low weight.

However, the Yamaha XSR700 2017 has some weaknesses, including the readability of the display, the license plate holder being a matter of taste, lack of consistency in some design details, and concept-related poor wind protection when driving fast. The Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2019 has some weaknesses as well, including an uncomfortable seating position, the need to be driven above 3000 revs, and being rather uncomfortable on long journeys.

In conclusion, the Yamaha XSR700 2017 and the Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2019 are both impressive naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The Yamaha XSR700 offers a cool retro look, a wide range of accessories, and a sporty yet easy-to-drive nature. On the other hand, the Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 stands out with its fantastic design, powerful engine, and lightweight construction. Ultimately, the choice between these two bikes will depend on individual preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Yamaha XSR700 2017 compared to Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2019

Yamaha XSR700 2017
Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2019

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore80 mmBore105 mm
StrokeStroke68.6 mmStroke80 mm
Engine powerEngine power75 HPEngine power75 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpm
TorqueTorque68 NmTorque72 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,500 rpmRpm at Torque6,750 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio12.8
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeAntihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesRocker arm, OHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement689 ccmDisplacement693 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
TravelTravel130 mmTravel135 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
TravelTravel130 mmTravel135 mm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameChromium-molybdenum
RakeRake65.5 degreeRake65 degree
TrailTrail90 mmTrail109 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeSingle disk
DiameterDiameter282 mmDiameter320 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter245 mmDiameter240 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width160 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,405 mmWheelbase1,434 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height830 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)186 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)157 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity12 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha XSR700 2017

Yamaha XSR700 2017

The XSR is the perfect everyday bike for me. It is visually a feast for the eyes, has an incredible amount of power, but is still light and agile. The seating position allows longer rides, as the luggage can be carried on the back without any problems. The XSR itself doesn't know exactly what it wants to be now. But I find the resulting mix quite exciting. So if you don't want to (or can't) have different bikes in the garage, the XSR is a very good choice. served very well. It has everything you expect from a motorbike. In a hotel, one would speak of an all-inclusive offer. It is perfect for It is perfect for the daily ride to the office, for weekend excursions and smaller tours to the south. Even with a pillion, the bike is very easy to move. As usual from Yamaha, the bike makes a very solid impression. Everything simply works here. The exhaust is pleasantly quiet, but from 5000 rpm it produces a very appealing and throaty sound. The rear end is a matter of taste. Personally, I would rebuild the rear and remove the plastic elements. I also find the standard mirrors a little large. The retro look was not quite carried through here. However, this can be changed very quickly and easily thanks to the many accessories. The instrument panel is basically easy to read. However, a lot of information is space. Here, design and functionality clash a little. Summarised in one sentence: The perfect bike for every challenge.

Wonderful engine

Solid workmanship

Cool retro look

Large range of original accessories

Great automatic gearshift

Sporty, tight chassis

Easy to drive

Joy dispenser for young and old alike

Readability of the display

licence plate holder a matter of taste

lack of consistency in some design details

concept-related poor wind protection when driving fast

Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2019

Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2019

The Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 is still a true highlight among light, handy motorbikes because of its unrivalled characteristics. Its appearance is unique and the technology under the pretty design is also impressive. The combination of 75 hp from the well-known single-cylinder, paired with a superbly shifting quickshifter, creates an insane amount of joy on the road. However, the engine needs revs and the seating position will not please everyone. The Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 is therefore a motorbike that you have to get completely involved with. If you can do that, a lot of fun is guaranteed.

fantastic design

powerful engine

quickshifter with blipper function

high-quality chassis

sporty seating position

low weight

Uncomfortable seating position

must be driven above 3000 revs

rather uncomfortable on long journeys.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha XSR700 vs Husqvarna Vitpilen 701

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha XSR700 2017 and a Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2019. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 7. It takes less time to sell a Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 with 57 days compared to 91 days for the Yamaha XSR700. Since model year 2015 1000PS.de editors have written 26 reviews for the Yamaha XSR700 and 17 reviews for the Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 since model year 2018. The first review for the Yamaha XSR700 was published on 22/07/2015 and now has more than 13,700 views. This compares to more than 79,100 views for the first review on Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 published on 07/11/2017.

Price Yamaha XSR700

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna Vitpilen 701

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG