BMW F 700 GS 2016 vs. Suzuki V-Strom 650 2011

BMW F 700 GS 2016

BMW F 700 GS 2016

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2011

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2011

Loading...

Overview - BMW F 700 GS 2016 vs Suzuki V-Strom 650 2011

The BMW F 700 GS 2016 and the Suzuki V-Strom 650 2011 are both enduro motorcycles with similar features and specifications. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine performance, the BMW F 700 GS 2016 has a larger displacement of 798cc compared to the Suzuki V-Strom 650 2011's 645cc. This results in the BMW having a higher engine power of 75 HP compared to the Suzuki's 67 HP. The BMW also has a higher torque of 77 Nm compared to the Suzuki's 60 Nm. These differences in engine power and torque give the BMW F 700 GS 2016 a slight advantage in terms of overall performance.

Both motorcycles have a chain transmission system, ensuring efficient power transfer to the wheels. However, the BMW F 700 GS 2016 has a steel frame, while the Suzuki V-Strom 650 2011 has an aluminum frame. The choice of frame material can affect the overall weight and handling of the motorcycle. The Suzuki's aluminum frame contributes to its relatively low overall weight, which is an advantage for maneuverability and agility.

BMW F 700 GS 2016

BMW F 700 GS 2016

In terms of braking, both motorcycles are equipped with double disk brakes at the front. This ensures strong stopping power and good control. The BMW F 700 GS 2016 and the Suzuki V-Strom 650 2011 both have a front tire diameter of 19 inches and a rear tire diameter of 17 inches. However, the Suzuki has a slightly wider rear tire width of 150mm compared to the BMW's 140mm. This may provide the Suzuki with better traction and stability.

In terms of dimensions, both motorcycles have a similar wheelbase of around 1550mm. They also have the same seat height of 820mm, which provides a comfortable riding position for most riders. However, the Suzuki V-Strom 650 2011 has a larger fuel tank capacity of 22 liters compared to the BMW F 700 GS 2016's 16 liters. This gives the Suzuki a longer range and may be advantageous for long-distance touring.

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2011

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2011

In terms of strengths, the BMW F 700 GS 2016 is praised for its manageability, surprising power, comfortable seating position, low seat height, good brakes, and competitive price. On the other hand, the Suzuki V-Strom 650 2011 is praised for its relatively low overall weight, pleasant sound, positive ergonomics and seat comfort, strong and well-controllable brakes, ABS, and well-equipped features.

As for weaknesses, the BMW F 700 GS 2016 is criticized for its aesthetics, while the Suzuki V-Strom 650 2011 is noted to experience a slight decrease in engine performance when carrying a passenger on long journeys.

Overall, both the BMW F 700 GS 2016 and the Suzuki V-Strom 650 2011 are capable enduro motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two ultimately depends on the rider's preferences and priorities, whether it be power, weight, comfort, or features.

Technical Specifications BMW F 700 GS 2016 compared to Suzuki V-Strom 650 2011

BMW F 700 GS 2016
Suzuki V-Strom 650 2011

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore82 mmBore81 mm
StrokeStroke75.6 mmStroke62.6 mm
Engine powerEngine power75 HPEngine power67 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,300 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,800 rpm
TorqueTorque77 NmTorque60 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque5,500 rpmRpm at Torque6,400 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio11.5
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement798 ccmDisplacement645 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTubular, Load-bearing engineFrame typeTwin-Spar

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height80 %Front tyre height80 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter19 inchFront tyre diameter19 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,280 mmLength2,290 mm
WidthWidth855 mmWidth840 mm
HeightHeight1,240 mmHeight1,390 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,562 mmWheelbase1,555 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height820 mmSeat Height820 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)209 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)220 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16 lFuel Tank Capacity22 l
Top SpeedTop Speed192 km/hTop Speed180 km/h
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW F 700 GS 2016

BMW F 700 GS 2016

The smaller of the two F GS sisters, the F 700 GS convinces with a successful overall performance. It looks like its big sister, but at its core it is more of a lively naked bike than a big enduro. The fact that the bike has outgrown the entry-level segment can be seen in the braking system - with two brake discs at the front, it is on a par with its big 800 sister and now decelerates just as confidently. In terms of the chassis, it convinces with good suspension comfort and at the same time a firm set-up in tight bends. Upgrading is never a problem with BMW; in addition to traction control, there is also the electronic suspension ESA for the F 700 GS.

Very manageable

surprisingly powerful

comfortable seating position

low seat height

good brakes

good price.

any optics

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2011

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2011

A very well-equipped Suzuki, the likes of which you don't see every day. From the extensively integrated electronics to the pleasant riding experience, you basically have everything you need for motorcycling.

Relatively low overall weight

pleasant sound

positive ergonomics and seat comfort

strong, well-controllable brakes

ABS

well equipped.

The engine does tend to slow down with a passenger on long journeys.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW F 700 GS vs Suzuki V-Strom 650

There are a few key differences between a BMW F 700 GS 2016 and a Suzuki V-Strom 650 2011. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW F 700 GS 2016 is about 65% higher. A BMW F 700 GS 2016 experiences a loss of 230 GBP in one year and 360 GBP in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 220 GBP and 810 GBP for a Suzuki V-Strom 650 2011. Compared to Suzuki V-Strom 650 2011 there are more BMW F 700 GS 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 15 compared to 10. It takes less time to sell a Suzuki V-Strom 650 with 61 days compared to 90 days for the BMW F 700 GS. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 7 reviews for the BMW F 700 GS and 38 reviews for the Suzuki V-Strom 650 since model year 2005. The first review for the BMW F 700 GS was published on 02/07/2012 and now has more than 18,800 views. This compares to more than 4,000 views for the first review on Suzuki V-Strom 650 published on 16/09/2003.

Price BMW F 700 GS

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Suzuki V-Strom 650

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG