KTM 1090 Adventure 2017 vs. Honda CRF1100L Africa Twin 2020

The KTM 1090 Adventure 2017 and the Honda CRF1100L Africa Twin 2020 are both enduro motorcycles that offer powerful engines and advanced rider assistance systems. However, there are several differences between the two models.

In terms of engine specifications, the KTM 1090 Adventure 2017 is equipped with a V-twin engine with a displacement of 1050cc and produces 125 horsepower and 109 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the Honda CRF1100L Africa Twin 2020 features an inline twin engine with a displacement of 1084cc, delivering 102 horsepower and 105 Nm of torque. While the KTM offers slightly higher power, the Honda provides a high-torque engine.

Both motorcycles come with a chain transmission and electric starter. They also feature upside-down telescopic forks for the front suspension, with the KTM using WP forks with a diameter of 43mm and a travel of 185mm, while the Honda utilizes Showa forks with a diameter of 45mm and a travel of 230mm. In terms of rear suspension, both models have swing arms with monoshock absorbers. The KTM has a WP shock absorber with a travel of 190mm, while the Honda features a Showa shock absorber with a travel of 220mm. The Honda offers slightly longer suspension travel, which can be beneficial for off-road riding.

KTM 1090 Adventure 2017

In terms of chassis, the KTM 1090 Adventure 2017 has a chromium-molybdenum frame, while the Honda CRF1100L Africa Twin 2020 features a steel frame. The KTM has a frame type of tubular, while the Honda has a double cradle frame. The KTM has a rake of 64 degrees and a trail of 120mm, while the Honda has a rake of 62.5 degrees and a trail of 113mm. Both motorcycles come with double disk brakes at the front.

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, both models offer ABS, riding modes, and traction control. However, the Honda CRF1100L Africa Twin 2020 has additional features such as cornering ABS, ride by wire, anti-wheelie, and a touch-screen color display. The KTM 1090 Adventure 2017 does not have these additional features.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the KTM has a front tire diameter of 19 inches and a rear tire diameter of 17 inches, while the Honda has a front tire diameter of 21 inches and a rear tire diameter of 18 inches. Both motorcycles have a rear tire width of 150mm. The KTM has a wheelbase of 1560mm, while the Honda has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1575mm. Both models have a seat height of 850mm and a kerb weight (with ABS) of around 226-228kg. The KTM has a larger fuel tank capacity of 23 liters, compared to the Honda's 18.8 liters.

In terms of equipment, the KTM 1090 Adventure 2017 features an adjustable windscreen, while the Honda CRF1100L Africa Twin 2020 comes with LED headlights. The KTM also has adjustable ergonomics, allowing riders to customize their riding position, while the Honda is praised for its good ergonomics and long-distance capability.

Honda CRF1100L Africa Twin 2020

In terms of strengths, the KTM 1090 Adventure 2017 is known for its very powerful engine, adjustable ergonomics, and agile handling. It also has a relatively low weight and a comparatively low price. On the other hand, the Honda CRF1100L Africa Twin 2020 is praised for its high-torque engine, sophisticated electronic driving aids, and optional DCT (Dual Clutch Transmission). It also features a touch-screen color display and is considered to have good ergonomics and long-distance capability.

In terms of weaknesses, the KTM 1090 Adventure 2017 is criticized for its outdated optics compared to the newer 1290 Super Adventures and its non-adjustable suspension fork. The Honda CRF1100L Africa Twin 2020 has been noted for having a flood of buttons on the left handlebar that may not be very clear and handguards that are not very robust for off-road use. Some riders have also found the windshield on the Honda to offer only manageable protection.

Overall, both the KTM 1090 Adventure 2017 and the Honda CRF1100L Africa Twin 2020 are capable enduro motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two would depend on the rider's preferences and priorities, such as power, electronic features, and off-road capabilities.