BMW F 750 GS 2018 vs. Triumph Tiger 900 GT Pro 2020

The BMW F 750 GS 2018 and the Triumph Tiger 900 GT Pro 2020 are both enduro motorcycles that offer a combination of on-road and off-road capabilities. While they share some similarities in terms of engine type, front and rear suspension, and tire dimensions, there are also notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine specifications, the BMW F 750 GS 2018 is equipped with a 2-cylinder in-line engine with a displacement of 853ccm, producing 77 horsepower and 83 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the Triumph Tiger 900 GT Pro 2020 features a 3-cylinder in-line engine with a larger displacement of 888ccm, delivering 95.2 horsepower and 87 Nm of torque. This gives the Triumph Tiger 900 GT Pro a slight advantage in terms of power and torque.

Both motorcycles feature electric starters and chain transmissions, providing smooth and efficient power delivery. However, the BMW F 750 GS 2018 has a steel frame with a tubular, load-bearing engine design, while the Triumph Tiger 900 GT Pro 2020 also has a steel frame but with a tubular design. The BMW F 750 GS 2018 has a slightly lower rake angle of 63 degrees compared to the Triumph Tiger 900 GT Pro's 65.4 degrees, which may affect the handling characteristics of the motorcycles.

BMW F 750 GS 2018

In terms of suspension, the BMW F 750 GS 2018 is equipped with a telescopic fork front suspension with a diameter of 41mm and a travel of 151mm. The rear suspension consists of a swing arm with a monoshock and offers a travel of 177mm, with preload and rebound adjustment. On the other hand, the Triumph Tiger 900 GT Pro 2020 features an upside-down telescopic fork front suspension with a larger diameter of 45mm and a travel of 180mm. The rear suspension is also a swing arm with a monoshock, offering a travel of 170mm and preload and rebound adjustment. The Triumph Tiger 900 GT Pro's suspension also benefits from electronic adjustability, allowing for a more personalized riding experience.

Both motorcycles are equipped with double disk front brakes for reliable stopping power. The BMW F 750 GS 2018 features ABS as an advanced rider assistance system, while the Triumph Tiger 900 GT Pro 2020 offers a more comprehensive range of advanced rider assistance systems, including suspension electronically adjustable, riding modes, cornering ABS, ride by wire, and traction control.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both motorcycles have a 19-inch front tire diameter and a 150mm rear tire width with a 17-inch rear tire diameter. The wheelbase of the BMW F 750 GS 2018 is slightly longer at 1559mm compared to the Triumph Tiger 900 GT Pro's 1556mm. The seat height of the BMW F 750 GS 2018 is also slightly higher at 815mm compared to the Triumph Tiger 900 GT Pro's 810mm. However, the Triumph Tiger 900 GT Pro has a larger fuel tank capacity of 20 liters, compared to the BMW F 750 GS 2018's 15-liter capacity.

Triumph Tiger 900 GT Pro 2020

In terms of strengths, the BMW F 750 GS 2018 offers a powerful engine with a pleasant sound, a comfortable seating position, stable brakes, playful handling, an extensive range of accessories, riding modes, traction control, and LED headlights. On the other hand, the Triumph Tiger 900 GT Pro 2020 boasts a three-cylinder engine full of character, agile turn-in behavior, a quickshifter as standard, electronically adjustable suspension strut, generous standard equipment, good ergonomics, good wind and weather protection, and long-distance capability.

As for weaknesses, the BMW F 750 GS 2018 is criticized for its very low bikini screen and inconspicuous appearance. The Triumph Tiger 900 GT Pro 2020, on the other hand, has been noted for having a flood of switches on the left handlebar, which may be overwhelming for some riders.

Overall, both the BMW F 750 GS 2018 and the Triumph Tiger 900 GT Pro 2020 offer their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The BMW F 750 GS 2018 may appeal to riders looking for a comfortable and versatile motorcycle with a powerful engine, while the Triumph Tiger 900 GT Pro 2020 may be more suitable for those seeking a characterful three-cylinder engine and advanced rider assistance systems. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on individual preferences and riding needs.