Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 vs. Kawasaki Z650 2020
Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
Kawasaki Z650 2020
Přehled - Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 vs Kawasaki Z650 2020
The Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 and the Kawasaki Z650 2020 are both naked bikes with similar engine specifications. They both have an inline twin-cylinder engine with a displacement of 649cc and liquid cooling. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.
In terms of power, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 has a slightly higher engine power of 72 HP compared to the Kawasaki Z650 2020 which has 68.2 HP. However, the torque of the Z650 is slightly higher at 65.7 Nm compared to the ER-6n's 64 Nm. Both bikes have a two-cylinder engine configuration and a monoshock rear suspension.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
When it comes to the chassis, the ER-6n 2013 has a steel frame with a perimeter design, while the Z650 2020 has a steel frame with a tubular design. Both bikes have double disk front brakes with double piston calipers and petal technology. The ER-6n 2013 is equipped with a solid handling and a high-quality level, but it is criticized for its weak brake performance. On the other hand, the Z650 2020 is praised for its stable chassis and powerful two-cylinder engine. It also has an aggressive intake noise and compact dimensions, making it suitable for urban riding. The Z650 also features a low seat height, making it more accessible for shorter riders.
In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire width and diameter, as well as the same wheelbase. However, the Z650 2020 has a slightly lower seat height of 790 mm compared to the ER-6n 2013's 805 mm. The Z650 is also lighter with a kerb weight of 185 kg compared to the ER-6n's 204 kg. With ABS, the Z650 weighs 187.1 kg, while the ER-6n weighs 208 kg. Both bikes have a fuel tank capacity of 15 liters for the Z650 and 16 liters for the ER-6n.
Kawasaki Z650 2020
In terms of additional features, the Z650 2020 has a TFT display with connectivity, allowing riders to connect their smartphones and access various functions. It also has a more grown-up look compared to the ER-6n. However, the Z650's front brake pressure point has been criticized, and it may not be as comfortable for taller riders. The Rideology App, which is available for both models, is not considered to be 100% sophisticated.
Overall, the Kawasaki Z650 2020 offers a more powerful engine, compact dimensions, and additional features such as connectivity and a TFT display. However, the ER-6n 2013 has a higher engine power and a larger fuel tank capacity. Both bikes have their strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between them will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Technické údaje Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 ve srovnání s Kawasaki Z650 2020
Výhody a nevýhody ve srovnání
Výhody a nevýhody ve srovnání
Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
Motor je vydatný a zábavný, navíc ER září japonskou pečlivostí a bojovou cenou.
Kawasaki Z650 2020
Je prostě úžasné, co Kawasaki s novou Z650 spojila do kompletního balíčku. Jednotlivé technické komponenty vám možná nevyrazí dech, ale jejich kombinace vytváří příjemně neutrální motocykl, který si užije každý. Žádné otravné idiosynkrazie - prostě naháč, který na klikatých venkovských silnicích funguje opravdu dobře. Plusem je samozřejmě TFT displej, který u konkurence momentálně nenajdeme, a také dospělý vzhled, který je silně orientovaný na větší modely Z. Pouze přítlačný bod přední brzdy mohl být jasněji definován - ale v této cenové kategorii nelze mít všechno.
Srovnání cen průměrná tržní cena Kawasaki ER-6n vs Kawasaki Z650
There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 and a Kawasaki Z650 2020. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki ER-6n with 42 days compared to 80 days for a Kawasaki Z650. Since model year 2006 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the Kawasaki ER-6n and 31 reviews for the Kawasaki Z650 since model year 2017. The first review for the Kawasaki ER-6n was published on 6/29/2005 and now has more than 11,200 views. This compares to more than 25,000 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z650 published on 11/8/2016.
